Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 432 / Initiated Law 1 of 1996
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 432.201 (2026)

Short title.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN GAMING CONTROL AND REVENUE ACT


Initiated Law 1 of 1996


432.201 Short title.

Section 1.

    Short Title.

    This act shall be known and may be cited as the Michigan Gaming Control and Revenue Act.

History: 1996, Initiated Law 1, Eff. Dec. 5, 1996

PopularName Notes:

Proposal E
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 32 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1999–2026 · leading case: Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. State, 685 N.W.2d 221 (Mich. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. State, 685 N.W.2d 221 (Mich. 2004). · cites it 6× “The only casino gambling that is authorized in Michigan is that gambling conducted in accordance with the Michigan Gaming Control and Revenue Act (MGCRA), MCL 432.201 et seq. However, by its express terms, the MGCRA does not apply to "gambling on Native American land.”
Papas v. Gaming Control Bd., 669 N.W.2d 326 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 4× “§ 432.201 et seq. We conclude that defendant does have exclusive jurisdiction over the matters involved in this case.”
Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. State, 478 Mich. 99 (Mich. 2007). · cites it 4× “Casino gaming in Michigan is only allowed pursuant to the Michigan Gaming Control and Revenue Act, MCL 432.201 et seq., which does not apply to “[g]ambling on Native American land,” MCL 432.”
Michigan Educ. Ass'n v. Sec'y of State, 489 Mich. 194 (Mich. 2010). “(providing that an employee of the state or local unit of government may not engage in political affairs during working hours); the Michigan Gaming Control and Revenue Act, MCL 432.201 et seq. (providing that members, employees, or agents of the Michigan Gaming Control Board may…”
Parise v. Detroit Ent., LLC, 811 N.W.2d 98 (Mich. Ct. App. 2011). “In lieu of filing an answer to plaintiffs complaint, defendant, a casino subject to the Michigan Gaming Control and Revenue Act (MGCRA), MCL 432.201 et seq., filed a motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.”
Kraft v. Detroit Ent., LLC, 683 N.W.2d 200 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004). “These claims are “preempted” 1 by § 3 of the Michigan Gaming Control and Revenue Act (MGCRA), MCL 432.201 et seq. We affirm. I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE Detroit Entertainment, L.”
Michigan Educ. Ass'n v. Sec'y of State, 793 N.W.2d 568 (Mich. 2010). · cites it 2× “(providing that an employee of the state or local unit of government may not engage in political affairs during working hours); the Michigan Gaming Control and Revenue Act, MCL 432.201 et seq. (providing that members, employees, or agents of the Michigan Gaming Control Board may…”
Protect MI Constitution v. Sec'y of State, 824 N.W.2d 299 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “Additionally, the CFMMJ proposal addresses subjects related to casino gaming that are presently governed by the Michigan Gaming Control and Revenue Act (the Gaming Act), MCL 432.201 et seq., which was enacted by voter initiative in 1996.”
Barden Detroit Casino, L.L.C. v. City of Detroit, 59 F. Supp. 2d 641 (E.D. Mich. 1999). · cites it 2× “§ 432.201, et seq. (the “Act”), which govern the selection and licensing of casino developers in the City of Detroit, respectively.”
Kraft v. Detroit Ent., LLC, 683 N.W.2d 200 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004). “These claims are "preempted" [1] by § 3 of the Michigan Gaming Control and Revenue Act (MGCRA), MCL 432.201 et seq. We affirm. I. Facts and Procedure Detroit Entertainment, L.”
Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. State, 708 N.W.2d 115 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 4× “nancial transactions between the state of Michigan and a tribe, describe how payments are made from a tribe to the Michigan Strategic Fund, describe how funds flow to local units of government, describe how such payments are calculated, and indicate that such payments will be…”
Lindsey v. Detroit Ent., LLC, 484 F.3d 824 (6th Cir. 2007). “, The Michigan Gaming Control and Revenue Act, Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 432.201 to 432.256. Specifically, Plaintiffs rely on Rule 1003 of the Michigan Gaming Control Board, which establishes various procedures for detained or arrested persons.”
Show all 32 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.