Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.1106 (2026)

Meanings.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE


Act 174 of 1962


440.1106 Meanings.

Sec. 1106.

    All of the following apply in this act, unless the statutory context otherwise requires:

    (a) Words in the singular number include the plural, and those in the plural include the singular.

    (b) Words of any gender also refer to any other gender.

History: 1962, Act 174, Eff. Jan. 1, 1964 ;-- Am. 2012, Act 86, Eff. July 1, 2013

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1970–2016 · leading case: Gorman v. Am. Honda Motor Co., 839 N.W.2d 223 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013).
Gorman v. Am. Honda Motor Co., 839 N.W.2d 223 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013). “PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM FOR BREACH OF THE OBLIGATION OF GOOD FAITH Plaintiff argues that a right under the UCC is enforceable by an action unless specifically excluded pursuant to MCL 440.1106(2). 6 Thus, plaintiff asserts she may maintain an independent action for a breach of the…”
Sullivan Indus., Inc. v. Double Seal Glass Co., 480 N.W.2d 623 (Mich. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “MCL 440.1106(1); MSA 19.1106(1). MCL 440.”
Horizon Lawn Maint., Inc. v. Columbus-Kenworth, Inc., 188 F. Supp. 3d 631 (E.D. Mich. 2016). · cites it 3× “On the page of Olbrys cited in text above, the Sixth Circuit cited Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.1106 (1), but the Code has since'been re-numbered in part, and the current version , of § 440.”
Henderson v. Chrysler Corp., 477 N.W.2d 505 (Mich. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “] The same reasoning led the court in Volkswagen of America, Inc v Novak, 418 So 2d 801, 804 (Miss, 1982), to reject the manufacturer's claim that it *345 was not liable in an action for revocation of acceptance: VWoA argues however that they were not a party to the sales…”
Head v. Phillips Camper Sales & Rental, Inc, 593 N.W.2d 595 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). “Accordingly, the trial court properly granted directed verdicts for defendants on plaintiff’s claims for conversion because they were under no obligation to return the specific money entrusted to them.”
Colonial Dodge, Inc. v. Miller, 328 N.W.2d 678 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 2× “2709 provides: "(1) When the buyer fails to pay the price as it becomes due the seller may recover, together with any incidental damages under the next section, the price "(a) of goods accepted * * * "(b) of goods identified to the contract if the seller is unable after…”
Pamar Enter., Inc. v. Huntington Banks, 580 N.W.2d 11 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “See MCL 440.1106; MSA 19.1106; White Co Bank v Noland Co, 214 Ga App 780, 783; 449 SE2d 325 (1994).”
Intervale Steel v. Borg & Beck Div., Borg-Warner, 578 F. Supp. 1081 (E.D. Mich. 1984). · cites it 2× “§ 440.1106. 34 Subsection 2-714(2) does not require this strict interpretation and inequitable result.”
Yamaha Motor Corp., USA v. Tri-City Motors & Sports, Inc., 429 N.W.2d 871 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988). “MCL 440.1106; MSA 19.1106. The ucc is a highly integrated body of statutes whose provisions must be carefully read as such.”
Haken v. Scheffler, 180 N.W.2d 206 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970). · cites it 4× “2703 (Stat Ann 1964 Rev § 19.2703) indicates the general remedies of the seller.”
Firwood Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Gen. Tire, Inc., 96 F.3d 163 (6th Cir. 1996). “remedies are to be liberally construed to ensure that the aggrieved party is “put in as good a position as if the other party had fully performed-” Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 440.1106 (West 1994).”
Davis v. Forest River, Inc., 774 N.W.2d 327 (Mich. 2009). “" MCL 440.1106. See also, Dynamic Recycling Services, Inc.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.1106(1) — 4 cases
Sullivan Indus., Inc. v. Double Seal Glass Co., 480 N.W.2d 623 (Mich. Ct. App. 1991). “MCL 440.1106(1); MSA 19.1106(1). MCL 440.”
Colonial Dodge, Inc. v. Miller, 328 N.W.2d 678 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982). “2709 provides: "(1) When the buyer fails to pay the price as it becomes due the seller may recover, together with any incidental damages under the next section, the price "(a) of goods accepted * * * "(b) of goods identified to the contract if the seller is unable after…”
Haken v. Scheffler, 180 N.W.2d 206 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970). “2703 (Stat Ann 1964 Rev § 19.2703) indicates the general remedies of the seller.”
Horizon Lawn Maint., Inc. v. Columbus-Kenworth, Inc., 188 F. Supp. 3d 631 (E.D. Mich. 2016). “On the page of Olbrys cited in text above, the Sixth Circuit cited Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.1106 (1), but the Code has since'been re-numbered in part, and the current version , of § 440.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.1106(2) — 2 cases
Gorman v. Am. Honda Motor Co., 839 N.W.2d 223 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013). “PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM FOR BREACH OF THE OBLIGATION OF GOOD FAITH Plaintiff argues that a right under the UCC is enforceable by an action unless specifically excluded pursuant to MCL 440.1106(2). 6 Thus, plaintiff asserts she may maintain an independent action for a breach of the…”
Head v. Phillips Camper Sales & Rental, Inc, 593 N.W.2d 595 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). “Accordingly, the trial court properly granted directed verdicts for defendants on plaintiff’s claims for conversion because they were under no obligation to return the specific money entrusted to them.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.