Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 440 / Act 174 of 1962

Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.2313b

Express warranty; extension; merchant or warrantor to give purchaser writing stating time period.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE


Act 174 of 1962


440.2313b Express warranty; extension; merchant or warrantor to give purchaser writing stating time period.

Sec. 2313b.

    An express warranty covering goods sold to a purchaser in this state shall be extended by a period equal to the number of days prescribed in subdivisions (a) and (b), if the cumulative number of days is more than either 10 days or 10% of the number of days of the warranty. A merchant or warrantor shall at the time the goods are repaired give the purchaser a writing stating the time period prescribed in subdivisions (a) and (b):

    (a) The date from which the goods are delivered to the merchant or the warrantor for a warranteed repair to the date the purchaser is informed that the necessary repair has been completed.

    (b) The date from which the merchant or warrantor attempts to make a warranteed repair to the goods at the purchaser's residence, domicile, or place of business to the date the necessary repairs are completed. In addition to this time period, the number of days preceding the date the merchant or warrantor begins a repair during which the goods were inoperative due to the need for a warranteed repair beginning with the date the purchaser notifies the merchant or warrantor in writing that the goods are inoperative and the merchant or warrantor receives the notice.

History: Add. 1978, Act 133, Eff. Mar. 30, 1979

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2005–2018 · leading case: Pidcock v. Ewing
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pidcock v. Ewing (2005) mied · cites it 4× “§ 440.2313b which provides: Sec. 2313b. An express warranty covering goods sold to a purchaser in this state shall be extended by a period equal to the number of days prescribed in subdivisions (a) and (b), if the cumulative number of days is more than either 10 days or 10% of…”
Best Way Expediting LLC v. Navistar Inc (2018) michctapp · cites it 5× “The hearing continued with the parties addressing plaintiff’s assertion that it was entitled to a warranty extension as provided for by MCL 440.2313b, that the warranties failed of their essential purpose, and that it had properly revoked its acceptance of the trucks.”
Best Way Expediting LLC v. Navistar Inc (2018) michctapp · cites it 5× “The hearing continued with the parties addressing plaintiff’s assertion that it was entitled to a warranty extension as provided for by MCL 440.2313b, that the warranties failed of their essential purpose, and that it had properly revoked its acceptance of the trucks.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 440.2313b(a) — 2 cases
Best Way Expediting LLC v. Navistar Inc (2018) michctapp “The hearing continued with the parties addressing plaintiff’s assertion that it was entitled to a warranty extension as provided for by MCL 440.2313b, that the warranties failed of their essential purpose, and that it had properly revoked its acceptance of the trucks.”
Best Way Expediting LLC v. Navistar Inc (2018) michctapp “The hearing continued with the parties addressing plaintiff’s assertion that it was entitled to a warranty extension as provided for by MCL 440.2313b, that the warranties failed of their essential purpose, and that it had properly revoked its acceptance of the trucks.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.