Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 484 / Act 32 of 1986

Mich. Comp. Laws § 484.1101

Short title.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

EMERGENCY 9-1-1 SERVICE ENABLING ACT


Act 32 of 1986


484.1101 Short title.

Sec. 101.

    This act shall be known and may be cited as the "emergency 9-1-1 service enabling act".

History: 1986, Act 32, Imd. Eff. Mar. 17, 1986 ;-- Am. 2007, Act 164, Imd. Eff. Dec. 21, 2007

PopularName Notes:

9-1-1
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1994–2024 · leading case: In Re Public Service Commission's Determination Regarding Coin-Operated Telephones, Direct-Inward Dialing & Touchtone Se
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Public Service Commission's Determination Regarding Coin-Operated Telephones, Direct-Inward Dialing & Touchtone Se (1994) michctapp “It addressed only coin-operated telephones in § 207a, rather than "cash” telephones, which latter term would embrace those accepting both paper currency and coins, or "pay telephones,” as it did in the 1986 Emergency Telephone Service Enabling Act, MCL 484.1101 et *354 seq.; MSA…”
In Re Complaint of Southfield Against Ameritech Michigan (1999) michctapp “On appeal, Ameritech argues that the regulation imposed and the penalties invoked by the PSC under the MTA are erroneous, because such regulation and penalties are unavailable under the Emergency Telephone Service Enabling Act (etsea), MCL 484.”
City of Potterville v. County of Eaton (2017) michctapp “The School District also moved for summary disposition under MCR 2.”
City of Potterville v. County of Eaton (2017) michctapp “The School District also moved for summary disposition under MCR 2.”
Estate of Richard a Croteau v. Charter Communications Inc (2022) michctapp “In essence, defendants argued that they were immune from suit under § 1604 of the Emergency 9-1- 1 Service Enabling Act, MCL 484.1101 et seq. (the “Act”). Under that section, service providers such as defendants are immune from civil liability except where it is shown their acts…”
James Stefanski v. Saginaw County 911 Communications Center Auth (2024) michctapp “, and the Emergency 9-1-1 Service Enabling Act, MCL 484.1101 et seq. Additionally, gross negligence is a violation of the common law, which is a law of this state, so his report that Bissell’s actions were grossly negligent was a protected activity under the WPA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.