Mich. Comp. Laws § 52.207
Violent, unexpected or medically unattended deaths; investigation by county medical examiner; inquest.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
COUNTY MEDICAL EXAMINERS
Act 181 of 1953
52.207 Violent, unexpected or medically unattended deaths; investigation by county medical examiner; inquest.
Sec. 7.
Upon the written order of the prosecuting attorney or the attorney general or upon the filing of a petition signed by 6 electors of a county, the county medical examiner or deputy shall conduct an investigation, as provided in section 5, of the circumstances surrounding any death believed to have occurred in the county. Upon determination of the prosecuting attorney or upon the determination of the examiner an inquest shall be held by a district court judge or a municipal court judge.
History: 1953, Act 181, Eff. Jan. 1, 1954 ;-- Am. 1959, Act 222, Eff. Mar. 19, 1960 ;-- Am. 1968, Act 274, Eff. Nov. 15, 1968 ;-- Am. 1969, Act 92, Imd. Eff. July 24, 1969
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1991–2019 · leading case: Swickard v. Wayne County Medical Examiner
Swickard v. Wayne County Medical Examiner (1991)
“MCL 52.207; MSA 5.953(7). This provision was amended to provide that upon determination of the prosecuting attorney " or upon the determination of the examiner an inquest shall be held by a district court judge or a municipal court judge.”
People v. Dendel (2010)
“202(1)(a) (mandating a medical examiner to conduct an autopsy when the deceased’s death was unexpected), MCL 52.207 (mandating a medical examiner to conduct an autopsy upon the order of a prosecuting attorney).”
Hadix v. Caruso (2006)
“Michigan Compiled Laws § 52.207 also mandates investigation by the medical examiner upon a petition by “six electors” of a county.”
Theresa M Heller v. Joyce L Dejong Do (2019)
“, MCL 52.207 (requiring a medical examiner to conduct an investigation upon written request of the attorney general); MCL 52.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.