CONDOMINIUM ACT
Act 59 of 1978
559.276 Statute of limitations.
Sec. 176.
(1) The following limitations apply in a cause of action arising out of the development or construction of the common elements of a condominium project, or the management, operation, or control of a condominium project:
(a) If the cause of action accrues on or before the transitional control date, a person shall not maintain an action against a developer, residential builder, licensed architect, contractor, sales agent, or manager of a condominium project later than 3 years after the transitional control date or 2 years after the date on which the cause of action accrued, whichever occurs later.
(b) If the cause of action accrues after the transitional control date, a person shall not maintain an action against a developer, residential builder, licensed architect, contractor, sales agent, or manager of a condominium project later than 2 years after the date on which the cause of action accrued.
(2) Subsection (1) applies only to condominium projects established on or after the effective date of the amendatory act that added this subsection.
History: Add. 2000, Act 379, Imd. Eff. Jan. 2, 2001 ;-- Am. 2002, Act 283, Imd. Eff. May 9, 2002
Notes of Decisions
Reserve at Heritage Vill. Ass'n v. Warren Fin. Acquisition, LLC, 850 N.W.2d 649 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014).
· cites it 22× “On August 1, 2013, the trial court denied plaintiffs motion for partial reconsideration, concluding that *103 MCL 559.276 applied to Warren and Winnick as successive developers and to the other defendants either directly or because they were alleged to be the agents or alter…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 559.276(1) — 1 case
Reserve at Heritage Vill. Ass'n v. Warren Fin. Acquisition, LLC, 850 N.W.2d 649 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014).
“On August 1, 2013, the trial court denied plaintiffs motion for partial reconsideration, concluding that *103 MCL 559.276 applied to Warren and Winnick as successive developers and to the other defendants either directly or because they were alleged to be the agents or alter…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 559.276(l)(a) — 1 case
Reserve at Heritage Vill. Ass'n v. Warren Fin. Acquisition, LLC, 850 N.W.2d 649 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014).
“On August 1, 2013, the trial court denied plaintiffs motion for partial reconsideration, concluding that *103 MCL 559.276 applied to Warren and Winnick as successive developers and to the other defendants either directly or because they were alleged to be the agents or alter…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 559.276(l)(b) — 1 case
Reserve at Heritage Vill. Ass'n v. Warren Fin. Acquisition, LLC, 850 N.W.2d 649 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014).
“On August 1, 2013, the trial court denied plaintiffs motion for partial reconsideration, concluding that *103 MCL 559.276 applied to Warren and Winnick as successive developers and to the other defendants either directly or because they were alleged to be the agents or alter…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.