Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.2904 (2026)

Repealed. 1964, Act 170, Eff. July 1, 1965.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961

Act 236 of 1961

600.2904 Repealed. 1964, Act 170, Eff. July 1, 1965.

Repealed. 1964, Act 170, Eff. July 1, 1965.

Compiler's Notes:

The repealed section abolished governmental immunity of political subdivisions in actions arising out of operation of motor vehicles, and provided for payment of premiums on liability insurance.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1967–1976 · leading case: Advisory Opinion on Constitutionality of 1975 PA 227, 1975 PA 227 (Mich. 1976).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Advisory Opinion on Constitutionality of 1975 PA 227, 1975 PA 227 (Mich. 1976). · cites it 2× “[18] The statutory provisions abolishing the defense of governmental function resulting from the negligent operation of a motor vehicle (MCLA 600.2904; MSA 27A.2904) and limiting the liability of a merchant for conduct involving persons suspected of larceny of goods (MCLA 600.”

Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294, 1972 PA 294 (Mich. 1973). · cites it 2× “151, now MCLA 600.2904; MSA 27A.2904; limitation on the liability of a merchant for conduct involving persons suspected of larceny of goods, 1958 PA 182 ; 1948 CL 692.”

Branum v. Bd. of Regents of Univ., 145 N.W.2d 860 (Mich. Ct. App. 1967). “…decide whether the waiver of governmental immunity by the State of Michigan, PA 1961, No 236 §§ 2904, 6475 (CLS 1961, §§ 600.2904, 600-.6475, Stat Ann 1962 Rev §§ 27A.2904, 27A.6475), did waive the governmental immunity of the board of regents of the University of Michigan.…”

Repub. Franklin Ins. v. City of Walker, 169 N.W.2d 175 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 2× “5 The statutory provision just referred to was reenacted as part of the Eevised Judicature Act, MCLA § 600.2904 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 27A.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.