Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 691.1713 (2026)

Savings clause.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

UNIFORM ARBITRATION ACT

Act 371 of 2012

691.1713 Savings clause.

Sec. 33.

This act does not affect an action or proceeding commenced or right accrued before this act takes effect.

History: 2012, Act 371, Eff. July 1, 2013

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2014–2025 · leading case: W.J. O'Neil Co. v. Shepley, Bulfinch, Richardson & Abbott, Inc., 765 F.3d 625 (6th Cir. 2014).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

W.J. O'Neil Co. v. Shepley, Bulfinch, Richardson & Abbott, Inc., 765 F.3d 625 (6th Cir. 2014). · cites it 2× “Mich. Comp. Laws § 691.1713 . Nevertheless, our analysis would not change under the new law.”

Fette v. Peters Constr. Co, 871 N.W.2d 877 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “before this act takes effect,” MCL 691.1713. Consequently, because defendant filed its claim for arbitration before July 1,2013, the arbitration proceeding was commenced before July 1, 2013, and the UAA does not apply.”

Savers Prop. & Cas. Ins. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins., 748 F.3d 708 (6th Cir. 2014). “Mich. Comp. Laws § 691.1713 . We therefore look to that regime, which incorporated Michigan Court Rule 3.”

Nickola v. Mic Gen. Ins. Co., 878 N.W.2d 480 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “” MCL 691.1713. See also Fette, 310 Mich App at 542 .”

Est. of Abdel M Bazzy v. Citizens Ins. Co. of Am. (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “Some courts have held that challenges to the enforceability of an arbitration 3 Defendant argues that the UAA does not govern this case pursuant to MCL 691.1713 of the UAA, which provides that “[t]his act does not affect an action or proceeding commenced or right accrued before…”

William Beaumont Hosp. v. West Bloomfield Mob LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “, has been repealed and replaced with the Uniform Arbitration Act, MCL 691.1681 et seq.”

Savers Prop.& Cas. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. (6th Cir. 2014). “Mich. Comp. Laws § 691.1713 . We therefore look to that regime, which incorporated Michigan Court Rule 3.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.