Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 700.3505 (2026)
Supervised administration; interim orders; partial distribution or other relief.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
ESTATES AND PROTECTED INDIVIDUALS CODE
Act 386 of 1998
700.3505 Supervised administration; interim orders; partial distribution or other relief.
Sec. 3505.
Unless otherwise ordered by the court, supervised administration is terminated by an order in accordance with time restrictions, notices, and contents of orders prescribed for proceedings under section 3952. The court may issue an interim order approving or directing a partial distribution or granting other relief at any time during the pendency of a supervised administration on the petition of the personal representative or an interested person.
History: 1998, Act 386, Eff. Apr. 1, 2000 ;-- Am. 2000, Act 54, Eff. Apr. 1, 2000
PopularName Notes:
EPICNotes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case (1 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: In Re Conservatorship of Dlw (Mich. Ct. App. 2025).
In Re Conservatorship of Dlw (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). “However, on appeal, the only issue addressed by this Court relative to the GAL fee was whether the trial court could properly order the GAL to be compensated if the GAL had failed to fulfill his statutory obligations under MCL 700.3505(1). Id. at 8. This Court ruled that the GAL…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 700.3505(1) — 1 case
In Re Conservatorship of Dlw (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). “However, on appeal, the only issue addressed by this Court relative to the GAL fee was whether the trial court could properly order the GAL to be compensated if the GAL had failed to fulfill his statutory obligations under MCL 700.3505(1). Id. at 8. This Court ruled that the GAL…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 700.3505(2) — 1 case
In Re Conservatorship of Dlw (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). “However, on appeal, the only issue addressed by this Court relative to the GAL fee was whether the trial court could properly order the GAL to be compensated if the GAL had failed to fulfill his statutory obligations under MCL 700.3505(1). Id. at 8. This Court ruled that the GAL…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.