Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 700.5304 (2026)

Evaluation and report; hearing.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

ESTATES AND PROTECTED INDIVIDUALS CODE


Act 386 of 1998


700.5304 Evaluation and report; hearing.

Sec. 5304.

    (1) If necessary, the court may order that an individual alleged to be incapacitated be examined by a physician or mental health professional appointed by the court who shall submit a report in writing to the court at least 5 days before the hearing set under section 5303. A report prepared as provided in this subsection must not be made a part of the proceeding's public record, but must be available to the court or an appellate court in which the proceeding is subject to review, to the alleged incapacitated individual, to the petitioner, to their respective legal counsels, and to other persons as the court directs. The report may be used as provided in the Michigan rules of evidence.

    (2) The alleged incapacitated individual has the right to secure an independent evaluation, at the individual's own expense or, if indigent, at the expense of the state. Compensation for an independent evaluation at public expense must be in an amount that, based on time and expense, the court approves as reasonable.

    (3) A report prepared under this section must contain all of the following:

    (a) A detailed description of the individual's physical or psychological infirmities.

    (b) An explanation of how and to what extent each infirmity interferes with the individual's ability to receive or evaluate information in making decisions.

    (c) A listing of all medications the individual is receiving, the dosage of each medication, and a description of the effects each medication has on the individual's behavior.

    (d) A prognosis for improvement in the individual's condition and a recommendation for the most appropriate rehabilitation plan.

    (e) The signatures of all individuals who performed the evaluations on which the report is based.

    (4) The individual alleged to be incapacitated is entitled to be present at the hearing to appoint a guardian or designate a standby guardian in person, and to see or hear all evidence bearing on the individual's condition. If the individual wishes to be present at the hearing, all practical steps must be taken to ensure the individual's presence, including, if necessary, moving the hearing site.

    (5) The individual is entitled to be represented by legal counsel, to present evidence, to cross-examine witnesses, including the court-appointed physician or mental health professional and the visitor, and to trial by jury.

    (6) The issue of incapacity may be determined at a closed hearing without a jury if requested by the individual alleged to be incapacitated or that individual's legal counsel.

    

    

History: 1998, Act 386, Eff. Apr. 1, 2000 ;-- Am. 2024, Act 1, Imd. Eff. Feb. 21, 2024

PopularName Notes:

EPIC
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2021–2026 · leading case: In Re Guardianship of Mary Ann Malloy (Mich. 2024).
In Re Guardianship of Mary Ann Malloy (Mich. 2024). · cites it 2× “See MCL 700.5304; MCL 700.5306a. 8 A court may only appoint a guardian if the court concludes by clear and 6 EPIC defines “ward” as “an individual for whom a guardian is appointed,” MCL 700.”
In Re Guardianship of Dana Jenkins (Mich. 2024). · cites it 2× “See MCL 700.5304; MCL 700.5306a. 8 A court may only appoint a guardian if the court concludes by clear and 6 EPIC defines “ward” as “an individual for whom a guardian is appointed,” MCL 700.”
in Re Guardianship of Rodrick Gordon (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). “” MCL 700.5304(1). This authority extends to petitions to terminate a guardianship.”
In Re Guardianship of Jo & Contempt of Gerald Zamborowski (Mich. Ct. App. 2026). “” In re Malloy Guardianship, 513 Mich 148 , 157; 15 NW3d 142 (2024), citing MCL 700.5304 and MCL 700.5306a. However, this Court has declared that, with respect to criminal defendants, “the right to counsel of choice is not absolute” and must be weighed against “the public’s…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 700.5304(1) — 1 case
in Re Guardianship of Rodrick Gordon (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). “” MCL 700.5304(1). This authority extends to petitions to terminate a guardianship.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 700.5304(2) — 2 cases
In Re Guardianship of Mary Ann Malloy (Mich. 2024). “See MCL 700.5304; MCL 700.5306a. 8 A court may only appoint a guardian if the court concludes by clear and 6 EPIC defines “ward” as “an individual for whom a guardian is appointed,” MCL 700.”
In Re Guardianship of Dana Jenkins (Mich. 2024). “See MCL 700.5304; MCL 700.5306a. 8 A court may only appoint a guardian if the court concludes by clear and 6 EPIC defines “ward” as “an individual for whom a guardian is appointed,” MCL 700.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.