Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.18c

Retention of jurisdiction of child committed under MCL 712A.18(1)(e); effective date of subsection (2); annual review; release of child.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PROBATE CODE OF 1939


Act 288 of 1939


712A.18c Retention of jurisdiction of child committed under MCL 712A.18(1)(e); effective date of subsection (2); annual review; release of child.

Sec. 18c.

    (1) If a child is committed under section 18(1)(e) of this chapter for an offense which, if committed by an adult, would be punishable by imprisonment for more than 1 year or an offense expressly designated by law to be a felony, the court shall retain jurisdiction over the child.

    (2) If a child is committed under section 18(1)(e) of this chapter and the child was adjudicated as being in the court's jurisdiction under section 2(a) of this chapter, the court shall retain jurisdiction over the child. This subsection shall take effect June 1, 1991.

    (3) If the court has retained jurisdiction over a child under this section, the court shall conduct an annual review of the services being provided to the child, the child's placement, and the child's progress in that placement. In conducting this review, the court shall examine the child's annual report prepared pursuant to section 3 of the juvenile facilities act. The court may order changes in the child's placement or treatment plan based on the review.

    (4) If the court has retained jurisdiction over a child under this section, the child may be released only with the approval of the court. Except as otherwise provided in section 18d, the child shall be automatically released upon reaching 19 years of age.

History: Add. 1988, Act 54, Eff. Oct. 1, 1988

Compiler's Notes:

    Section 3 of Act 54 of 1988 provides: “This amendatory act shall take effect June 1, 1988.” This section was amended by Act 174 of 1988 to read as follows: “This amendatory act shall take effect October 1, 1988.”

PopularName Notes:

Probate Code

PopularName Notes:

Juvenile Code
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1993–2011 · leading case: Storey v. Vasbinder
Storey v. Vasbinder (2011) ca6 · cites it 2× “Finally, the fact that Campbell, having done no investigation, failed to challenge the juvenile court waiver, either procedurally or substantively, supports the conclusion that Campbell's failure to perform as required resulted in prejudice to Storey.”
People v. Hana (1993) mich · cites it 2× “See MCL 712A.18c(4); MSA 27.3178(598.18c)(4).”
Michigan Protection & Advocacy Service, Inc. v. Miller (1994) miwd · cites it 2× “§ 712A.18c(3). The court has the authority to order changes in the minor’s treatment or placement based on the review.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.18c(3) — 1 case
Michigan Protection & Advocacy Service, Inc. v. Miller (1994) miwd “§ 712A.18c(3). The court has the authority to order changes in the minor’s treatment or placement based on the review.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.18c(4) — 1 case
People v. Hana (1993) mich “See MCL 712A.18c(4); MSA 27.3178(598.18c)(4).”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 712A.18c(l) — 1 case
Michigan Protection & Advocacy Service, Inc. v. Miller (1994) miwd “§ 712A.18c(3). The court has the authority to order changes in the minor’s treatment or placement based on the review.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.