Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 750 / Act 328 of 1931

Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.333

Repealed. 1974, Act 266, Eff. Apr. 1, 1975.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE


Act 328 of 1931


750.333 Repealed. 1974, Act 266, Eff. Apr. 1, 1975.

    Repealed. 1974, Act 266, Eff. Apr. 1, 1975.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed section pertained to incest.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1950–1998 · leading case: People v. Helzer
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Helzer (1978) mich · cites it 4× “280, the incest statute, MCL 750.333; MSA 28.565, the indecent exposure statute, MCL 750.”
People v. Johnson (1979) mich “280 (assault with intent to commit rape, sodomy, or gross indecency); MCL 750.333; MSA 28.565 (incest); MCL 750.”
McCready v. Hoffius (1998) mich · cites it 2× “§ 750.333, 750.336, and 750.339-750.342; MSA 28.”
People v. Winford (1978) mich · cites it 2× “280, the incest statute, MCL 750.333; MSA 28.565, the gross indecency statutes, MCL 750.”
People v. Lipski (1950) mich · cites it 4× “Incest is sexual intercourse between 2 persons who are within the degree of relationship, either by consanguinity or affinity, wherein marriage to each other is prohibited, and the commission of incest is likewise a felony.”
People v. Garrison (1983) michctapp “It is important to note that the crimes of incest, MCL 750.333; MSA 28.565, and carnal knowledge, MCL 750.”
People v. Hawk (1971) michctapp · cites it 2× “Defendant first contends the trial court erroneously charged the jury that incest (MCLA § 750.333 [Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.565]) was a lesser and included offense to statutory rape.”
People v. Porchia (1970) michctapp · cites it 2× “By leave granted, defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for incest, MCLA § 750.333 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.565).”
United States v. Vander Jagt (1955) miwd “1948, § 750.333, which provides: “Incest — Any person who is within the degree of consanguinity with another within which marriages are prohibited or declared by law to be incestuous and void, or the marriage of whom is prohibited by sections 3 and 4 of chapter 83 of the Revised…”
BALODIS (1980) bia “Neither need we be concerned with the situation where a marriage validly contracted in another state solely to evade the statutory prohibitions in the parties' state of residence may be held invalid where the law of the parties' state of residence so specifies.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.