THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Act 175 of 1927
764.15d Federal law enforcement officer; powers.
Sec. 15d.
(1) A federal law enforcement officer may enforce state law to the same extent as a state or local officer only if all of the following conditions are met:
(a) The officer is authorized under federal law to arrest a person, with or without a warrant, for a violation of a federal statute.
(b) The officer is authorized by federal law to carry a firearm in the performance of his or her duties.
(c) One or more of the following apply:
(i) The officer possesses a state warrant for the arrest of the person for the commission of a felony.
(ii) The officer has received positive information from an authoritative source, in writing or by telegraph, telephone, teletype, radio, computer, or other means, that another federal law enforcement officer or a peace officer possesses a state warrant for the arrest of the person for the commission of a felony.
(iii) The officer is participating in a joint investigation conducted by a federal agency and a state or local law enforcement agency.
(iv) The officer is acting pursuant to the request of a state or local law enforcement officer or agency.
(v) The officer is responding to an emergency.
(2) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (3), a federal law enforcement officer who meets the requirements of subsection (1) has the privileges and immunities of a peace officer of this state.
(3) This section does not impose liability upon or require indemnification by the state or a local unit of government for an act performed by a federal law enforcement officer under this section.
(4) As used in this section:
(a) "Emergency" means a sudden or unexpected circumstance that requires immediate action to protect the health, safety, welfare, or property of an individual from actual or threatened harm or from an unlawful act.
(b) "Local unit of government" means a county, city, village, or township.
History: Add. 1987, Act 256, Imd. Eff. Dec. 28, 1987 ;-- Am. 1999, Act 64, Eff. Oct. 1, 1999
Notes of Decisions
Lewandowski v. Nuclear Mgmt. Co., LLC, 724 N.W.2d 718 (Mich. Ct. App. 2006).
“1(p) (definition of “federal law enforcement officer”) and MCL 764.15d (enumerating the power of a federal law enforcement officer to enforce state law) are both contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, MCL 760.”
People of Michigan v. Terence Mitchell Bruce (Mich. 2019).
· cites it 81× “The first factor was satisfied under MCL 764.15d, which provides that federal law enforcement officers may enforce state law to the same extent as a state or local officer when they are authorized under federal law with arrest powers and to carry a firearm and when they are…”
People of Michigan v. Terence Mitchell Bruce (Mich. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 13× “The state countered and relied on MCL 764.15d, which provides in pertinent part as follows: (1) A federal law enforcement officer may enforce state law to the same extent as a state or local officer only if all of the following conditions are met: (a) The officer is authorized…”
People of Michigan v. Terence Mitchell Bruce (Mich. Ct. App. 2017).
“15d allows federal law enforcement officers to enforce state law “to the same extent as a state or local officer” if certain conditions are met, the fact that defendants were temporarily enforcing Michigan law bears no relation to how their positions were created.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 764.15d(1) — 2 cases
People of Michigan v. Terence Mitchell Bruce (Mich. 2019).
“The first factor was satisfied under MCL 764.15d, which provides that federal law enforcement officers may enforce state law to the same extent as a state or local officer when they are authorized under federal law with arrest powers and to carry a firearm and when they are…”
People of Michigan v. Terence Mitchell Bruce (Mich. Ct. App. 2017).
“The state countered and relied on MCL 764.15d, which provides in pertinent part as follows: (1) A federal law enforcement officer may enforce state law to the same extent as a state or local officer only if all of the following conditions are met: (a) The officer is authorized…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 764.15d(1)(a) — 1 case
People of Michigan v. Terence Mitchell Bruce (Mich. 2019).
“The first factor was satisfied under MCL 764.15d, which provides that federal law enforcement officers may enforce state law to the same extent as a state or local officer when they are authorized under federal law with arrest powers and to carry a firearm and when they are…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 764.15d(1)(c)(i) — 1 case
People of Michigan v. Terence Mitchell Bruce (Mich. 2019).
“The first factor was satisfied under MCL 764.15d, which provides that federal law enforcement officers may enforce state law to the same extent as a state or local officer when they are authorized under federal law with arrest powers and to carry a firearm and when they are…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 764.15d(1)(c)(ii) — 1 case
People of Michigan v. Terence Mitchell Bruce (Mich. 2019).
“The first factor was satisfied under MCL 764.15d, which provides that federal law enforcement officers may enforce state law to the same extent as a state or local officer when they are authorized under federal law with arrest powers and to carry a firearm and when they are…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 764.15d(1)(c)(iii) — 2 cases
People of Michigan v. Terence Mitchell Bruce (Mich. 2019).
“The first factor was satisfied under MCL 764.15d, which provides that federal law enforcement officers may enforce state law to the same extent as a state or local officer when they are authorized under federal law with arrest powers and to carry a firearm and when they are…”
People of Michigan v. Terence Mitchell Bruce (Mich. Ct. App. 2017).
“The state countered and relied on MCL 764.15d, which provides in pertinent part as follows: (1) A federal law enforcement officer may enforce state law to the same extent as a state or local officer only if all of the following conditions are met: (a) The officer is authorized…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 764.15d(1)(c)(iv) — 1 case
People of Michigan v. Terence Mitchell Bruce (Mich. 2019).
“The first factor was satisfied under MCL 764.15d, which provides that federal law enforcement officers may enforce state law to the same extent as a state or local officer when they are authorized under federal law with arrest powers and to carry a firearm and when they are…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 764.15d(1)(c)(v) — 1 case
People of Michigan v. Terence Mitchell Bruce (Mich. 2019).
“The first factor was satisfied under MCL 764.15d, which provides that federal law enforcement officers may enforce state law to the same extent as a state or local officer when they are authorized under federal law with arrest powers and to carry a firearm and when they are…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 764.15d(2) — 2 cases
People of Michigan v. Terence Mitchell Bruce (Mich. 2019).
“The first factor was satisfied under MCL 764.15d, which provides that federal law enforcement officers may enforce state law to the same extent as a state or local officer when they are authorized under federal law with arrest powers and to carry a firearm and when they are…”
People of Michigan v. Terence Mitchell Bruce (Mich. Ct. App. 2017).
“The state countered and relied on MCL 764.15d, which provides in pertinent part as follows: (1) A federal law enforcement officer may enforce state law to the same extent as a state or local officer only if all of the following conditions are met: (a) The officer is authorized…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.