Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 780 / Act 8 of 1952

Mich. Comp. Laws § 780.151

Short title.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REVISED UNIFORM RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT OF SUPPORT ACT


Act 8 of 1952


780.151 Short title.

Sec. 1.

    This act shall be known and may be cited as the "revised uniform reciprocal enforcement of support act".

History: 1952, Act 8, Eff. Sept. 18, 1952 ;-- Am. 1985, Act 172, Eff. Mar. 1, 1986

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24 cases, 1975–2012 · leading case: Lme v. Ars
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lme v. Ars (2004) michctapp · cites it 4× “1103 provides, in relevant part: (c) "Initiating state" means a state from which a proceeding is forwarded or in which a proceeding is filed for forwarding to a responding state under this act or a law or procedure substantially similar to this act, the uniform reciprocal…”
Martin v. Coffey (1978) michctapp · cites it 4× “Plaintiff, a Michigan resident, sought to utilize the URESA to enforce a purported obligation of support owed by defendant, a Texas resident, to the parties' child, as established by a prior order of support entered as a result of an action under the Paternity Act, MCL 722.”
Brown v. Turnbloom (1979) michctapp · cites it 2× “In a URESA action where Michigan is the responding state, may the Michigan circuit judge, in determining the amount of support, take into consideration the alleged denial of the obligor's visitation rights? The purpose of URESA (MCL 780.151 et seq.; *167 MSA 25.225(1) et seq.”
Giesen v. Giesen (1985) michctapp · cites it 2× “2103, and the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act, MCL 780.151 et seq.; MSA 25.225(1) et seq.”
In Re SMNE (2004) michctapp “In the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act, MCL 780.151 et seq., “support order” is defined as.”
Ewing v. Bolden (1992) michctapp “5 We note that, procedurally, plaintiff had at her disposal the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (uresa), now known as the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (ruresa), MCL 780.151 et seq.; MSA 25.225(1) et seq.”
Gaudreau v. Kelly (2012) michctapp “Moreover, it would be blatantly unfair to address this issue because the Gaudreaus did not have the opportunity to factually respond to Kelly’s allegations raised for the first time on appeal.”
People v. Ditton (1977) michctapp “The preamble sets forth the following: "An act relative to the extradition of persons charged with failure to provide support for dependents and to provide for the enforcement by circuit courts in chancery of this state of the duty of such persons to support their dependents in…”
Cantor v. Cantor (1978) michctapp · cites it 2× “Thereafter, on July 30, 1968, plaintiff filed a petition under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act, MCL 780.151 et seq.; MSA 25.225(1) et seq.”
Watkins v. Springsteen (1980) michctapp “Upon receiving certification of the Wyoming action, 1 the prosecuting attorney for Ontonagon County instituted a responsive URESA proceeding against defendant on behalf of plaintiff, under the Michigan version of URESA, MCL 780.151 et seq.; MSA 25.225(1) et seq.”
Michigan Department of Social Services ex rel. D.H. v. K.S. (1994) moctapp “360 RSMo 1986 and MCL §§ 780.151— 780.183 (1990).”
McFarlane v. McFarlane (1997) michctapp “1 For example, plaintiff could have petitioned the Iowa court that issued the support order and retained jurisdiction over the matter, or proceeded under the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (ruresa), MCL 780.151 et seq.-, MSA 25.225(1) et seq.”
Show all 24 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.