Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 791.244 (2026)

Parole board interview of prisoner serving sentence for first degree murder or sentence of imprisonment for life without parole; board duties upon own initiation or receipt of application for reprieve, commutation, or pardon; exception; files as public record.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

CORRECTIONS CODE OF 1953


Act 232 of 1953


791.244 Parole board interview of prisoner serving sentence for first degree murder or sentence of imprisonment for life without parole; board duties upon own initiation or receipt of application for reprieve, commutation, or pardon; exception; files as public record.

Sec. 44.

    (1) Subject to the constitutional authority of the governor to grant reprieves, commutations, and pardons, 1 member of the parole board shall interview a prisoner serving a sentence for murder in the first degree or a sentence of imprisonment for life without parole at the conclusion of 10 calendar years and thereafter as determined appropriate by the parole board, until such time as the prisoner is granted a reprieve, commutation, or pardon by the governor, or is deceased. The interview schedule prescribed in this subsection applies to all prisoners to whom this section or section 44a applies, regardless of when they were sentenced.

    (2) Except in cases in which a commutation is requested based in part on a prisoner's medical condition and in which the governor has requested that the parole board expedite its review and hearing process under section 44a, upon its own initiation of, or upon receipt of an application for, a reprieve, commutation, or pardon, the parole board shall do all of the following, as applicable:

    (a) Not more than 60 days after receipt of an application, conduct a review to determine whether the application for a reprieve, commutation, or pardon has merit.

    (b) Deliver either the written documentation of the initiation or the original application with the parole board's determination regarding merit, to the governor and retain a copy of each in its file, pending an investigation and hearing.

    (c) Within 10 days after initiation, or after determining that an application has merit, forward to the sentencing judge and to the prosecuting attorney of the county having original jurisdiction of the case, or their successors in office, a written notice of the filing of the application or initiation, together with copies of the application or initiation, any supporting affidavits, and a brief summary of the case. Not more than 30 days after receipt of notice of the filing of any application or initiation, the sentencing judge and the prosecuting attorney, or their successors in office, may file information at their disposal, together with any objections, in writing. If the sentencing judge and the prosecuting attorney, or their successors in office, do not respond after not more than 30 days, the parole board shall proceed on the application or initiation.

    (d) If an application or initiation for commutation is based on physical or mental incapacity, direct the bureau of health care services to evaluate the condition of the prisoner and report on that condition. If the bureau of health care services determines that the prisoner is physically or mentally incapacitated, the bureau shall appoint a specialist in the appropriate field of medicine who is not employed by the department to evaluate the condition of the prisoner and to report on that condition. These reports are protected by the doctor-patient privilege of confidentiality, except that these reports shall be provided to the governor for his or her review.

    (e) Within 270 days after initiation by the parole board or receipt of an application that the parole board has determined to have merit under subdivision (a), make a full investigation and determination on whether or not to proceed to a public hearing.

    (f) Conduct a public hearing not later than 90 days after making a decision to proceed with consideration of a recommendation for the granting of a reprieve, commutation, or pardon. The public hearing must be held before a formal recommendation is transmitted to the governor. One member of the parole board who will be involved in the formal recommendation may conduct the hearing, and the public must be represented by the attorney general or a member of the attorney general's staff.

    (g) Not fewer than 30 days before conducting the public hearing, provide written notice of the public hearing by mail to the attorney general, the sentencing trial judge, and the prosecuting attorney, or their successors in office, and each victim who requests notice under the William Van Regenmorter crime victim's rights act, 1985 PA 87, MCL 780.751 to 780.834.

    (h) Conduct the public hearing under the rules promulgated by the department. Except as otherwise provided in this subdivision, a person having information in connection with the pardon, commutation, or reprieve must be sworn as a witness. A person who is a victim must be given an opportunity to address and be questioned by the parole board at the hearing or to submit written testimony for the hearing. In hearing testimony, the parole board shall give liberal construction to any technical rules of evidence.

    (i) Transmit its formal recommendation to the governor.

    (j) Make all data in its files available to the governor if the parole board recommends the granting of a reprieve, commutation, or pardon.

    (3) Except for medical records protected by the doctor-patient privilege of confidentiality, the files of the parole board in cases under this section are matters of public record.

History: 1953, Act 232, Eff. Oct. 2, 1953 ;-- Am. 1982, Act 314, Imd. Eff. Oct. 15, 1982 ;-- Am. 1992, Act 181, Imd. Eff. Sept. 22, 1992 ;-- Am. 1999, Act 191, Eff. Mar. 10, 2000 ;-- Am. 2017, Act 8, Eff. June 29, 2017

PopularName Notes:

Department of Corrections Act

AdminRule Notes:

    R 791.1101 et seq. of the Michigan Administrative Code.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1980–2024 · leading case: Makowski v. Governor, 852 N.W.2d 61 (Mich. 2014).
Makowski v. Governor, 852 N.W.2d 61 (Mich. 2014). · cites it 4× “243 and MCL 791.244, applications for commutation must first be presented to the parole board for a recommendation.”
In Re Parole of Glover, 575 N.W.2d 772 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 6× “§ 791.244(2)(f); M.S.A. § 28.2314(2)(f) to M.”
People v. Gay, 289 N.W.2d 651 (Mich. 1980). · cites it 2× “See also MCL 791.244; MSA 28.2314. Comparing these federal and state statutes, we must conclude that their maximum penalties are "greatly disparate”.”
Makowski v. Governor, 299 Mich. App. 166 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 3× “MCL 791.244 then prescribes the procedures for processing and investigating such applications by the parole board, “[s]ubject to the constitutional authority of the governor to grant reprieves, commutations, and pardons .”
Keith Lewis-El v. Barbara Sampson, 649 F.3d 423 (6th Cir. 2011). · cites it 2× “See Mich. Comp. Laws § 791.244 . Lewis-El claims that, upon his entry into prison, he was screened by Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) staff pursuant to the Guidelines for Commutation Recommendations in MDOC Policy Directive PD-DWA-45-12, and that these guidelines,…”
Berry v. Dep't of Corr., 324 N.W.2d 65 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 3× “” MCL 791.244; MSA 28.2314 governs the procedure for processing applications for reprieve, commutation, or pardon.”
In Re Parole of Johnson, 596 N.W.2d 202 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). “2 This hearing must be “held in the manner prescribed for pardons and commutations” in MCL 791.244(2)(f) and (h); MSA 28.2314(2)(f) and (h), and MCL 791.”
Shields v. Dep't of Corr., 340 N.W.2d 95 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). “234(4), which as noted above mandates that no parole be granted "until after a public hearing held in the manner prescribed for pardons and commutations” in MCL 791.244, subds (d) to (f); MSA 28.2314, subds (d) to (f).”
Manning v. Unknown Parties, 56 F. App'x 710 (6th Cir. 2003). “See Mich. Comp. Laws § 791.234 (6). The possibility of release upon reprieve, commutation, or pardon depends entirely on the discretion of the governor.”
Middleton v. Parole Bd., 528 N.W.2d 791 (Mich. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 3× “This is reflected by the provisions of the first sentence of MCL 791.244(2X0; MSA 28.2314(2)(f). 2 Under that initial provision, the public hearing is held after the parole board makes a decision to proceed with consideration of recommending a reprieve, commutation, or pardon…”
Shabazz v. Gabry, 900 F. Supp. 118 (E.D. Mich. 1995). · cites it 2× “§ 791.244, mandatory lifers were to be interviewed on the same 4+2 + 2, etc.”
Derrick Lashon Braddock v. Parole Bd. (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 5× “234(8(c), which applies to parole of prisoners serving life sentences, provides that the “decision to grant or deny parole to the prisoner must not be made until after a public hearing held in the manner prescribed for pardons and commutations in” MCL 791.244 and MCL 791.245.…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 791.244(1) — 1 case
Makowski v. Governor, 299 Mich. App. 166 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012). “MCL 791.244 then prescribes the procedures for processing and investigating such applications by the parole board, “[s]ubject to the constitutional authority of the governor to grant reprieves, commutations, and pardons .”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 791.244(2) — 1 case
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 791.244(2)(f) — 4 cases
In Re Parole of Glover, 575 N.W.2d 772 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “§ 791.244(2)(f); M.S.A. § 28.2314(2)(f) to M.”
In Re Parole of Johnson, 596 N.W.2d 202 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). “2 This hearing must be “held in the manner prescribed for pardons and commutations” in MCL 791.244(2)(f) and (h); MSA 28.2314(2)(f) and (h), and MCL 791.”
Middleton v. Parole Bd., 528 N.W.2d 791 (Mich. Ct. App. 1995). “This is reflected by the provisions of the first sentence of MCL 791.244(2X0; MSA 28.2314(2)(f). 2 Under that initial provision, the public hearing is held after the parole board makes a decision to proceed with consideration of recommending a reprieve, commutation, or pardon…”
Derrick Lashon Braddock v. Parole Bd. (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “234(8(c), which applies to parole of prisoners serving life sentences, provides that the “decision to grant or deny parole to the prisoner must not be made until after a public hearing held in the manner prescribed for pardons and commutations in” MCL 791.244 and MCL 791.245.…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 791.244(2)(h) — 1 case
In Re Parole of Glover, 575 N.W.2d 772 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “§ 791.244(2)(f); M.S.A. § 28.2314(2)(f) to M.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 791.244(h) — 1 case
Makowski v. Governor, 299 Mich. App. 166 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012). “MCL 791.244 then prescribes the procedures for processing and investigating such applications by the parole board, “[s]ubject to the constitutional authority of the governor to grant reprieves, commutations, and pardons .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.