Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 120.17 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 1957 [Repealed, Ex1959 c 71 art 8 s 26]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29
cases, 1956–2017 · leading case: Moubry ex rel. Moubry v. Indep. Sch. Dist. 696, 9 F. Supp. 2d 1086 (D. Minn. 1998).
Moubry ex rel. Moubry v. Indep. Sch. Dist. 696, 9 F. Supp. 2d 1086 (D. Minn. 1998). “Among the procedural frameworks created by the IDEA, Section 1415(b)(2) requires an independent Due Process Hearing to be conducted by a State educational agency, so as to ensure that the parents of handicapped children will be afforded an opportunity to register their…”
Moubry ex rel. Moubry v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 696, 951 F. Supp. 867 (D. Minn. 1996). “Among the procedural safeguards that are mandated by the IDEA, Section 1415(b)(2) requires an independent Due Process Hearing to be conducted by a State educational agency, so as to insure that the parents of handicapped children will be afforded an opportunity to register their…”
Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 283 v. S.D. ex rel. J.D., 948 F. Supp. 860 (D. Minn. 1995). “The requirement of Minn.Stat. § 120.17, subd. 3b(f), that the hearing decision be rendered no later than 45 days after a request for a hearing was waived by [S.”
C.N. ex rel. J.N. v. Willmar Pub. Schs., 591 F.3d 624 (8th Cir. 2010). “3d at 578 (emphasis added) (quoting former Minn.Stat. § 120.17, subd. 3b(e)). And in Thompson , we concluded that "[i]f a student changes school districts and does not request a due process hearing, his or her right to challenge prior educational services is not preserved.”
Glazier v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 876, 558 N.W.2d 763 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). “Any decision issued by a hearing officer may be appealed to the hearing review officer within 30 calendar days of receipt of that written decision.”
Peter v. Johnson, 958 F. Supp. 1383 (D. Minn. 1997). “See Minn.Stat. § 120.17 (1994); Minn. Rules Chapter 3525.”
Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 277 v. Pautz, 295 N.W.2d 635 (Minn. 1980). “Minn.Stat. § 120.17 (1978). In April 1978, the child’s parents, residents of Mound, Minnesota, contacted officials of the Independent School District # 277 (hereafter I.”
Moubry v. Kreb, 58 F. Supp. 2d 1041 (D. Minn. 1999). “XIV; (b) Whether there is subject matter jurisdiction for the imposition of sanctions comprised of the school district’s attorney’s fees and/or the hearing officer’s fee under Minn.Stat. § 120.17; (c) Whether it was error to dismiss the hearing and impose sanctions without…”
Special Sch. Dist. No. 1 v. R.M.M. ex rel. O.M., 861 F.3d 769 (8th Cir. 2017). “The statutory framework governing special education has been amended many times in the past 60 years.”
Sharon Digre v. Roseville Schs. Indep. Dist. No. 623, 841 F.2d 245 (8th Cir. 1988). “, the related Minnesota handicapped children statute, Minn.Stat. § 120.17(3b)(i), and the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment.”
Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 283 v. S.D. ex rel. J.D., 88 F.3d 556 (8th Cir. 1996). “See Minn.Stat.Ann. § 120.17, subd. 3b(e); Minn.”
Mary Schuldt v. Mankato Indep. Sch., 937 F.2d 1357 (8th Cir. 1991). “§§ 1400-85 (1988) (amended in 1991 to be named the “Individuals with Disabilities Education Act”), Minn.Stat.Ann. § 120.17 (Supp.1991) and 42 U.”
Minn. Stat. § 120.17(3b)(i): 1 case
Sharon Digre v. Roseville Schs. Indep. Dist. No. 623, 841 F.2d 245 (8th Cir. 1988). “, the related Minnesota handicapped children statute, Minn.Stat. § 120.17(3b)(i), and the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.