Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 168.75 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 2004 [Renumbered 53C.12]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1969–2003 · leading case: Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, 611 N.W.2d 346 (Minn. 2000).
Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, 611 N.W.2d 346 (Minn. 2000). “7 Similarly, the penalties set forth in Minn.Stat. § 168.75 8 for violations of Section 168.”
VanDanacker v. Main Motor Sales Co., 109 F. Supp. 2d 1045 (D. Minnesota 2000). “§ 1638 ), Motor Vehicle Installment Sales Act (Minn.Stat. § 168.75(b)(4)), Deceptive Trade Practices Act (Minn.”
Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, 668 N.W.2d 45 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). “Minn.Stat. § 168.75 (2002) (awarding reasonable attorney fees as part of the remedy for a statutory violation).”
Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, 598 N.W.2d 713 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999). “Minn.Stat. § 168.75 (1994) provides: (b) In case of an intentional failure to comply with any provision of sections 168.”
Kadlec Motors, Inc. v. Knudson, 383 N.W.2d 342 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “Kad-lec also claims the court had no basis for determining the time-price differential exceeded that allowed by Minn.Stat. § 168.75 (1982) and that any such violation was minor and should not be punished.”
O'BRIEN v. Phillips Motors Excelsior, Inc., 179 N.W.2d 158 (Minn. 1970). “Enforcement of that particular requirement is achieved by civil remedies provided in § 168.75, which provides in part: “ (b) In case of an intentional failure to comply with any provision of sections 168.”
LaBarre v. Credit Acceptance Corp., 11 F. Supp. 2d 1071 (D. Minnesota 1998). “” Minn.Stat. §§ 168.75(b) and (c). Thus, it is not intended to reach the assignee, but rather the party actually committing the violation.”
Ruona v. Freeway Dodge, Inc., 171 N.W.2d 212 (Minn. 1969). “77, other than a wilful failure, the buyer shall have a right to recover from the person committing such violation, to set off or counterclaim in any action by such person to enforce such contract an amount as liquidated damages equal to two times the time price differential,…”
Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth Dodge, 637 N.W.2d 587 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002). “The relevant provisions of MMVRISA for purposes of determining which statute of limitations applies to Scott’s claims are the statute’s liability provisions found in section 168.75. At the time contract II was executed, the statute provided: (b) In case of an intentional failure…”
Kedzior v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, Nat'l Ass'n, 527 N.W.2d 119 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). “74, we do not address respondent’s additional argument that the remedy provisions in Minn.Stat. § 168.75 that appellants are attempting to invoke, are, by their plain language, inapplicable to a violation of Minn.”
Kedzior v. Norwest Bank Minn., Nat. Ass'n, 527 N.W.2d 119 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). “74, we do not address respondent's additional argument that the remedy provisions in Minn.Stat. § 168.75 that appellants are attempting to invoke, are, by their plain language, inapplicable to a violation of Minn.”
— Minn. Stat. § 168.75(b) — 5 cases
Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, 668 N.W.2d 45 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). “Minn.Stat. § 168.75 (2002) (awarding reasonable attorney fees as part of the remedy for a statutory violation).”
Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, 611 N.W.2d 346 (Minn. 2000). “7 Similarly, the penalties set forth in Minn.Stat. § 168.75 8 for violations of Section 168.”
Kadlec Motors, Inc. v. Knudson, 383 N.W.2d 342 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “Kad-lec also claims the court had no basis for determining the time-price differential exceeded that allowed by Minn.Stat. § 168.75 (1982) and that any such violation was minor and should not be punished.”
LaBarre v. Credit Acceptance Corp., 11 F. Supp. 2d 1071 (D. Minnesota 1998). “” Minn.Stat. §§ 168.75(b) and (c). Thus, it is not intended to reach the assignee, but rather the party actually committing the violation.”
Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth Dodge, 637 N.W.2d 587 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002). “The relevant provisions of MMVRISA for purposes of determining which statute of limitations applies to Scott’s claims are the statute’s liability provisions found in section 168.75. At the time contract II was executed, the statute provided: (b) In case of an intentional failure…”
— Minn. Stat. § 168.75(b)(4) — 1 case
VanDanacker v. Main Motor Sales Co., 109 F. Supp. 2d 1045 (D. Minnesota 2000). “§ 1638 ), Motor Vehicle Installment Sales Act (Minn.Stat. § 168.75(b)(4)), Deceptive Trade Practices Act (Minn.”
— Minn. Stat. § 168.75(c) — 3 cases
O'BRIEN v. Phillips Motors Excelsior, Inc., 179 N.W.2d 158 (Minn. 1970). “Enforcement of that particular requirement is achieved by civil remedies provided in § 168.75, which provides in part: “ (b) In case of an intentional failure to comply with any provision of sections 168.”
Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, 668 N.W.2d 45 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). “Minn.Stat. § 168.75 (2002) (awarding reasonable attorney fees as part of the remedy for a statutory violation).”
Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth Dodge, 637 N.W.2d 587 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002). “The relevant provisions of MMVRISA for purposes of determining which statute of limitations applies to Scott’s claims are the statute’s liability provisions found in section 168.75. At the time contract II was executed, the statute provided: (b) In case of an intentional failure…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.