Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 216B.25 (2026)

Further Action On Previous Order

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The commission may at any time, on its own motion or upon motion of an interested party, and upon notice to the public utility and after opportunity to be heard, rescind, alter, or amend any order fixing rates, tolls, charges, or schedules, or any other order made by the commission, and may reopen any case following the issuance of an order therein, for the taking of further evidence or for any other reason. Any order rescinding, altering, amending, or reopening a prior order shall have the same effect as an original order.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1984–1997 · leading case: Petition of Peoples Nat. Gas Co., 358 N.W.2d 684 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Petition of Peoples Nat. Gas Co., 358 N.W.2d 684 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 216B.25 (1982) provides: The commission may at any time, on its own motion or upon motion of an interested party, and upon notice to the public' utility and after opportunity to be heard, rescind, alter or amend any order fixing rates, tolls, charges or schedules,…”

N. States Power Co. v. Minnesota Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 414 N.W.2d 383 (Minn. 1987). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 216B.25 (1984) provides as follows: The commission may at any time, on its own motion or upon motion of an interested party, and upon notice to the public utility and after opportunity to be heard, rescind, alter or amend any order fixing rates, tolls, charges or…”

Application of Minnegasco, 565 N.W.2d 706 (Minn. 1997). “§ 216B.25 (allowing the Commission to order any case reopened and to issue orders rescinding, altering, or amending any order fixing rates, and stating that such orders “shall have the same effect as an original order” (emphasis added)).”

Application of Minnegasco, 566 N.W.2d 727 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 4× “Counsel for Minnegasco cited Minn.Stat. § 216B.25 (1996), pertaining to further action by the Commission on its orders, as explicitly giving the MPUC the authority to adjust rates and to review its prior and previous orders if they are unlawful or unreasonable.”

Application of Minnegasco, 556 N.W.2d 607 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 216B.25 (1996) (emphasis added).”

In re City of White Bear Lake's Request for an Elec. Util. Serv. Area Change Within Its City Limits, 443 N.W.2d 204 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “Minn. Stat. § 216B.25 (1988). The MPUC therefore is empowered to reopen these proceedings and to consider evidence presented by the parties supporting and opposing the petition.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.