Minn. Stat. § 268.04
[Repealed]
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1998 c 265 s 46]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 93
cases, 1944–2015 · leading case: Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic Security
Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic Security (1986)
“In calculating Tuma’s wage credits under subdivision 3(3), however, the Commissioner excluded Tuma’s final paycheck on the grounds that it did not constitute “wage credits” under Minn.Stat. § 268.04, subd. 26 (1984). Tuma appealed this decision to the Court of Appeals, which…”
Stearns-Hotzfield v. Farmers Insurance Exchange (1985)
“On April 20, 1983, an Unemployment Compensation Tax Specialist issued a letter of determination informing Farmers that, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 268.04, subd. 9 (1982) and department rules, Farmers was engaged in an employer-employee relationship with the claimant and was…”
J.C. Penney Co. v. Commissioner of Economic Security (1984)
“Minn.Stat. § 268.04, subd. 25 (Supp.1983) (emphasis added).”
Geo. A. Hormel & Co. v. Asper (1988)
“” Minn.Stat. § 268.04, subd. 24 (1984). Section 268.”
LeGrand Supper Club v. Seline (1984)
“The decision of the referee was affirmed by a representative of the Commissioner on November 2, 1983.”
Jenson v. Department of Economic Security (2000)
“Minn.Stat. § 268.04, subd. 12(l)(d) (1996).”
Di Re v. Central Livestock Order Buying Co. (1956)
“its, is owned or controlled (by legally enforceable means or otherwise) directly or indirectly by the same interests, or which owns or controls one or more other employing units (by legally enforceable means or otherwise) and which, if treated as a single unit with such other…”
Ginsberg v. Minnesota Department of Jobs & Training (1992)
“Ginsberg argues the Commissioner erred by determining that the Assistant to *142 the Commissioner and Economic Opportunity Director positions were exempt from the definition of “employment” pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 268.04, subd. 12(10) (1990): [T]he term “employment” does not…”
Sticka v. Holiday Village South (1984)
“” When relator was involuntarily terminated from her employment as a structural engineer, she became “unemployed,” as that term is defined in Minn.Stat. § 268.04, subd. 23 (1982). The relator was eligible for "unemployment benefits, and — as the commissioner’s representative…”
Novitsky v. Department of Natural Resources (1982)
“Pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 268.04, subd. 2 (1980), the claim was assigned an effective date of October 26, 1980, and by operation of section 268.”
Hough Transit, Ltd. v. Harig (1985)
“Although we determine the drivers were not employees, we must still consider whether the drivers are included under other provisions of the unemployment services law.”
Lakeland Tool & Engineering, Inc. v. Engle (1990)
“" Minn.Stat. § 268.04, subd. 12 (1986). In Geerdes v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.