Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 300.04 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 301B.02]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1954–1982 · leading case: Vill. of Blaine v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 12, 121 N.W.2d 183 (Minn. 1963).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Vill. of Blaine v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 12, 121 N.W.2d 183 (Minn. 1963). · cites it 3× “) *15 Section 300.04 provides in part: “The state shall at all times have the right to supervise and regulate the business methods and management of any such corporation and from time to time to fix the compensation which it may charge or receive for its services.”

Iowa Elec. Light & Power Co. v. City of Fairmont, 67 N.W.2d 41 (Minn. 1954). · cites it 2× “117 allowing compensation for such improvements, extensions of service, and repairs as it *184 may be obligated to make under § 300.04 during the pendency of tbe proceedings; thus, that its property may be taken without just compensation therefor.”

Vill. of Blaine v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 12, 138 N.W.2d 32 (Minn. 1965). “It is equally clear that if a private utility is accorded a franchise to provide the service, it is subject to the control provided by § 300.04. According to 8A Dunnell, Dig. (3 ed.”

Minnesota Gas Co. v. Pub. Serv. Com., Etc., 394 F. Supp. 327 (D. Minnesota 1974). · cites it 2× ““It has been settled by this court that the state may authorize one of its municipal corporations to establish, by an inviolable contract, the rates to be charged by a pub-lie service corporation (or natural person) for a definite term, not grossly unreasonable in point of time,…”

Hayfield N. R.R. Co., Inc. v. Chicago & North W. Transp. Co., State of Minnesota, Intervenor/appellant, 693 F.2d 819 (8th Cir. 1982). “27 (West 1972); Minn. Stat.Ann. § 300.04 (West Supp.1982).”

Minnesota Gas Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 523 F.2d 581 (8th Cir. 1975). “Minn.Stat.Ann. § 300.04 (emphasis added).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.