Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 308.05 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1989 c 144 art 1 s 44; art 3 s 48]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1946–1988 · leading case: In Re Condemnation by Dairyland Power Coop., 82 N.W.2d 56 (Minn. 1957).
In Re Condemnation by Dairyland Power Coop., 82 N.W.2d 56 (Minn. 1957). · cites it 3× “05, which purports to empower cooperatives organized or qualified under §§ 308.05 to 308.18 and “engaged in the electrical, heat, light, power or telephone business, * * * to exercise the power of eminent domain in the manner provided by the laws of this state for the exercise…”
Gen. Minnesota Utils. Co. v. Carlton Cnty. Coop. Power Ass'n, 22 N.W.2d 673 (Minn. 1946). · cites it 4× “1941, § 308.05 [Mason St. 1927, § 7834]). Its corporate functions fit into the REA federal setup.”
Huygen v. Plums Enter. of St. Paul, Inc., 355 N.W.2d 149 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “(a) Did the Commission exceed its legal authority by ordering Plums to incorporate the non-discriminatory policy into an agreement to transfer, sell, review, or exchange its liquor license? Plums claims the Commission lacked authority to impose conditions on its liquor license.”
Benson Coop. Creamery Ass'n v. First Dist. Ass'n, 170 N.W.2d 425 (Minn. 1969). “Defendant, First District Association, located at Litchfield, Minnesota, is also a cooperative association governed by §§ 308.05 to 308.18. Its membership includes cooperative creameries in the Litchfield area.”
Universal Cooperatives, Inc. v. FCX, Inc. (In re FCX, Inc.), 853 F.2d 1149 (1988). “Minn.Stat.Ann. § 308.05 et seq. (West Supp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.