§
Subdivision 1.General.
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction in the following cases:
(1) all civil actions within their respective districts;
(2) in all cases of crime committed or triable therein;
(3) in all special proceedings not exclusively cognizable by some other court or tribunal;
(4) in law and equity for the administration of estates of deceased persons and all guardianship and incompetency proceedings;
(5) the jurisdiction of a juvenile court as provided in chapter 260;
(6) proceedings for the management of the property of persons who have disappeared, and actions relating thereto, as provided in chapter 578; and
(7) in all other cases wherein such jurisdiction is especially conferred upon them by law.
They shall also have appellate jurisdiction in every case in which an appeal thereto is allowed by law from any other court, officer, or body.
§
Subd. 2.Civil service reviews.
Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, the district court has jurisdiction to review a final decision or order of a civil service commission or board upon the petition of an employee or appointing authority in any first-class city. The employee and appointing authority have standing to seek judicial review in all these cases. Review of the decision or order may be had by securing issuance of a writ of certiorari within 60 days after the date of mailing notice of the decision to the party applying for the writ. To the extent possible, the provisions of rules 110, 111, and 115 of the Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure govern the procedures to be followed. Each reference in those rules to the court of appeals, the trial court, the trial court administrator, and the notice of appeal must be read, where appropriate, as a reference to the district court, the body whose decision is to be reviewed, to the administrator, clerk, or secretary of that body, and to the writ of certiorari, respectively. This subdivision does not alter or amend the application of sections 197.455 and 197.46, relating to veterans preference.
Notes of Decisions
City of Saint Paul v. Eldredge, 800 N.W.2d 643 (Minn. 2011).
· cites it 59× “On September 18, 2009, the City, acting pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 484.01 (2010), petitioned the Ramsey County District Court requesting the issuance of a writ of certiorari in order to obtain judicial review of the Commission’s decision.”
Vang v. State, 788 N.W.2d 111 (Minn. 2010).
· cites it 16× “And, in 2006, the Legislature amended Minn.Stat. § 484.01, subd. 1 (2004), to state that the district courts have "original jurisdiction in the following cases: .”
State v. Vang, 847 N.W.2d 248 (Minn. 2014).
· cites it 2× “Thus, consistent with the statutory scheme enacted by the Legislature, appellant became too old for the juvenile court to have exclusive jurisdiction over the case, and the district court’s general jurisdiction attached under Minn.Stat. § 484.01, subd. 1(2) (2012) (providing…”
State v. Harris, 667 N.W.2d 911 (Minn. 2003).
· cites it 12× “See Minn. Stat. § 484.01 , subd. 1 (2002); Minn.”
Bass v. Equity Residential Holdings, LLC, 849 N.W.2d 87 (Minn. Ct. App. 2014).
· cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 484.01 (2012). The district court may establish a program to “consolidate the hearing and determination of matters related to residential rental housing” and such programs are affirmatively established by statute in Ramsey and Hennepin Counties.”
State v. Grigsby, 806 N.W.2d 101 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011).
· cites it 3× “VI, § 3 and Minn.Stat. § 484.01, subd. 1 (2000)). Minn.”
Real Est. Equity Strategies, LLC v. Jones, 720 N.W.2d 352 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006).
· cites it 2× “” Minn.Stat. § 484.01, subd. 1 (2004). Also, the district court does not lack the equitable powers that even the municipal courts benefiting from the 1917 expansion of municipal-court jurisdiction lacked.”
Laymon v. Minnesota Premier Props., LLC, 903 N.W.2d 6 (Minn. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 2× “VI, §• 3, including cases “in law and equity for the administration of estates of deceased persons,” Minn. Stat. § 484.01 , subd. 1(4) (2016), and other cases involving “matters relating to the affairs of decedents,” Minn.”
Neujahr v. Ramsey Cnty. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 370 N.W.2d 446 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985).
· cites it 4× “The judicial review to which Jennifer Neujahr is entitled is before the district court under Minn.Stat. § 484.01 (1984), not before the Court of Appeals.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.