Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 501C.0204 (2026)

Order And Appeal

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.In rem judicial proceedings.

Upon the hearing of a petition under the district court's in rem jurisdiction, the court shall make an order it considers appropriate. The order is binding in rem upon the trust estate and all interested persons, including without limitation all beneficiaries, vested or contingent, even though unascertained or not in being. An appeal from an order which, in effect, determines the petition may be taken by any party after service by any party of written notice of its filing as provided under the Rules of Appellate Procedure or, if no notice is served, within six months after the filing of the order.

Subd. 2.In personam judicial proceedings.

Upon the hearing of a petition under the district court's in personam jurisdiction, the court shall make an order it considers appropriate. The order is binding on (1) a party who is served with notice of the judicial proceeding, (2) a party who appears in the judicial proceeding, and (3) any other party who may be bound by such parties as described in sections 501C.0301 to 501C.0305. An appeal from an order which, in effect, determines the petition may be taken by any party after service by any party of written notice of its filing as provided under the Rules of Appellate Procedure or, if no notice is served, within six months after the filing of the order.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: In the Matter of the Trust Created Under Agreement by & Between Janet E. Johnson, Settlor, & Paul Johnson, ... (Minn. 2025).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In the Matter of the Trust Created Under Agreement by & Between Janet E. Johnson, Settlor, & Paul Johnson, ... (Minn. 2025). · cites it 6× “” Minn. Stat. § 501C.0204. To the extent Johnson argued to the court of appeals that the July 2024 order is appealable under this statute, that issue was not raised to this court and is not before us.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.