Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 525.56 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 2002 [Repealed, 2003 c 12 art 2 s 8]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 39 cases, 1943–2014 · leading case: Matter of Conservatorship of Torres, 357 N.W.2d 332 (Minn. 1984).
Matter of Conservatorship of Torres, 357 N.W.2d 332 (Minn. 1984). · cites it 18× “The relevant statutory provision, Minn.Stat. § 525.56, subd. 3 (1982) provides that: The duties and powers * * * which the court may grant to a conservator of the person include, but are not limited to: * * * (4)(a) The power to give any necessary consent to enable the ward or…”
In Re Conservatorship of Foster, 547 N.W.2d 81 (Minn. 1996). · cites it 12× “5(b) (1994); Minn.Stat. § 525.56, subd. 2 (1994). The court is specifically authorized to grant the conservator the power to consent to necessary medical care or other professional care and treatment on behalf of the eonservatee.”
In Re the Guardianship of Jeffers J. Tschumy, Ward, 853 N.W.2d 728 (Minn. 2014). · cites it 4× “Compare Minn. Stat. § 525.56 , subd. 2 (1982) (“The court shall grant to a guardian or conservator only those powers necessary to provide for the demonstrated needs of the ward or conservatee.”
In Re Pub. Conservatorship of Foster, 535 N.W.2d 677 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 16× “The court may grant powers and duties to provide for the needs of the incapacitated person authorized under the general conservatorship statute, Minn.Stat. § 525.56, subds. 1-3, as well as additional powers specified in the public guardianship statute, Minn.”
In Re Guardianship of Dawson, 502 N.W.2d 65 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 6× “” Minn.Stat. § 525.56, subd. 5 (1992) (emphasis added).”
Matter of Blilie, 494 N.W.2d 877 (Minn. 1993). · cites it 2× “1989), because Minn.Stat. § 525.56, subd. 3(1) (1990) authorizes a guardian to admit a ward to a treatment center for temporary *881 care for up to 90 days.”
In Re the Conservatorship of Brady, 607 N.W.2d 781 (Minn. 2000). · cites it 13× “First, they argue that the district court did not place Brady in the living situation that would least limit her civil rights and restrict her personal freedom, as required by Minn.Stat. § 525.56, subd. 3(6) (1998). 4 This argument is based’ on their contention that living in…”
Fisher v. Schefers, 656 N.W.2d 592 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 10× “Accordingly, the court refused to set aside the land transaction pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 525.56, subd. 5 (2002), and affirmed the sale as originally executed.”
In Re the Custody of A.K.H., 502 N.W.2d 790 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “6198(2) (1992) (with reference to Minn.Stat. § 525.56, subd. 4 (1992)). A.K.”
In Re the Guardianship of Mikulanec, 356 N.W.2d 683 (Minn. 1984). · cites it 4× “” Minn.Stat. § 525.56, subd. 2 (1982). If all powers are granted, a guardianship is established; if less than all powers are granted, a conservatorship is established.”
In Re Guardianship of Kowalski, 382 N.W.2d 861 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 525.56, subd. 3(6). Here, the ward’s personal freedom to determine her own visitors has been limited.”
In Re Conservatorship of Moore, 409 N.W.2d 14 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 5× “Wherever possible and appropriate, the guardian or conservator should meet these requirements through governmental benefits or services to which the * * * conservatee is entitled, rather than from the * * * conservatee’s estate.”
— Minn. Stat. § 525.56(2) — 1 case
Hoverson v. Hoverson, 12 N.W.2d 497 (Minn. 1943).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.