Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 566. FORCIBLE ENTRY AND UNLAWFUL DETAINER
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 566.03 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1998 c 253 s 80]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22 cases, 1975–2019 · leading case: Cloverdale Foods of Minnesota, Inc. v. Snacks, 580 N.W.2d 46 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cloverdale Foods of Minnesota, Inc. v. Snacks, 580 N.W.2d 46 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 61× “Minn.Stat. § 566.03 (1996) provides: Subdivision 1.”
Minneapolis Pub. Hous. Auth. v. Lor, 591 N.W.2d 700 (Minn. 1999). · cites it 4× “[17] Minn.Stat. § 566.03, subd. 1(2) (1998). [18] Id.”
Fed. Land Bank of Saint Paul v. Obermoller, 429 N.W.2d 251 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 6× “The Obermollers also argue there is a conflict between the rules of civil procedure governing summary judgments and the statutory procedures for unlawful detainer actions because the longer time periods provided in the rules conflict with the provisions in the unlawful detainer…”
Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson, 929 N.W.2d 398 (Minn. 2019). · cites it 2× “Laws 445 , 445-46 (codified at Minn. Stat. § 566.03 (1971) ). Section 504B.”
Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson, 910 N.W.2d 485 (Minn. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 6× “Compare Minn. Stat. § 566.03 (1996), with Minn. Stat.”
Golphin v. Park Monroe Assocs., 353 A.2d 314 (D.C. 1976). · cites it 2× “Code 1973, § 45-902. Notices to quit — Month to month.”
Elk Creek Mgmt. Co. v. Gilbert, 303 P.3d 929 (Or. 2013). “Minn Stat § 566.03 (1971); RI Gen Laws Ann 34-20-10 (1968).”
Barnes v. Weis Mgmt. Co., 347 N.W.2d 519 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 4× “DISCUSSION Minn.Stat. § 566.03, subd. 2, provides: It shall be a defense to an action for recovery of premises following the alleged termination of a tenancy by notice to quit for the defendant to prove by a fair preponderance of the evidence that: (1) The alleged termination…”
Lanzo v. F & D Motor Works, 396 N.W.2d 631 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 4× “Defenses to unlawful detainer actions are set forth in Minn.Stat. § 566.03, subd. 2 as follows: Subd.”
Scroggins v. Solchaga, 552 N.W.2d 248 (Minn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “See Minn. Stat. § 566.03 , subd. 1(3) (1994) (unlawful detainer judgment may be issued if tenant at will holds over after notice to quit).”
Priordale Mall Investors v. Farrington, 411 N.W.2d 582 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “ISSUE Did the trial court err in dismissing this unlawful detainer action based on its conclusion that Priordale’s acceptance of rent constituted a waiver of its right to assert past defaults of the lease? ANALYSIS An unlawful detainer action lies where a tenant is holding over…”
Priordale Mall Investors v. Farrington, 390 N.W.2d 412 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 566.03, subd. 1 (1984), permits an unlawful detainer action "[w]hen any person holds over lands or tenements * * * contrary to the conditions or covenants of the lease or agreement under which he holds * * *.”
Show all 22 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.