Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 566.04 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1998 c 253 s 80]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1978–1987 · leading case: Priordale Mall Investors v. Farrington, 390 N.W.2d 412 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986).
Priordale Mall Investors v. Farrington, 390 N.W.2d 412 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “After a hearing, the trial court ordered the action dismissed on the ground that Minn.Stat. § 566.04 (1984) prevents unlawful detainer proceedings against a tenant who has been in possession of the property for three years prior to commencement of the action.”
Berg v. Wiley, 264 N.W.2d 145 (Minn. 1978). “We are mindful that by § 566.04 the summary remedy of §§ 566.02 to 566.”
Priordale Mall Investors v. Farrington, 411 N.W.2d 582 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “On December 13, this action was dismissed because the trial court concluded that Minn.Stat. § 566.04 prohibits institution of an unlawful detainer action if a tenant has been in possession of leased premises for three years.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.