Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 609.755 (2026)
Gambling; Misdemeanor
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Whoever does any of the following is guilty of a misdemeanor:
(1) makes a bet;
(2) sells or transfers a chance to participate in a lottery;
(3) disseminates information about a lottery, except a lottery conducted by an adjoining state, with intent to encourage participation therein;
(4) permits a structure or location owned or occupied by the actor or under the actor's control to be used as a gambling place; or
(5) except where authorized by statute, possesses a gambling device.
Clause (5) does not prohibit possession of a gambling device in a person's dwelling for amusement purposes in a manner that does not afford players an opportunity to obtain anything of value.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1968–2016 · leading case: Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39 (1968).
Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39 (1968). “533 (1954); Minn. Stat. §609.755 (1965); Miss. Code Ann.”
Citation Bingo, Ltd. v. Otten, 910 P.2d 281 (N.M. 1995). “302 (West 1991); Minn.Stat. § 609.755(5) (1994); Ohio Rev.”
Minnesota Souvenir Milkcaps, LLC v. State, 687 N.W.2d 400 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). “Minn.Stat. § 609.755 (2002). “A lottery is a plan which provides for the distribution of money, property or other reward or benefit to persons selected by chance from among participants some *403 or all of whom have given a consideration for the chance of being selected.”
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Deangelo Jones (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). “The group began gambling with another group of individuals they did not know by wagering money on basketball shots, which is a crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.755 (1) (2008). After losing money to the other group, Jones became angry and left the scene in order to acquire a gun.”
— Minn. Stat. § 609.755(5) — 1 case
Citation Bingo, Ltd. v. Otten, 910 P.2d 281 (N.M. 1995). “302 (West 1991); Minn.Stat. § 609.755(5) (1994); Ohio Rev.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.