Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 61B.06 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1993 c 319 s 20]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1985–1997 · leading case: Honeywell, Inc. v. Minnesota Life & Health Ins. Guar. Ass'n, 518 N.W.2d 557 (Minn. 1994).
Honeywell, Inc. v. Minnesota Life & Health Ins. Guar. Ass'n, 518 N.W.2d 557 (Minn. 1994). · cites it 22× “We answer the first certified question by holding that the 1992 amendment to the Act’s definition of “contractual obligation” effects a substantive change in those obligations, and answer the second certified question by holding that the right to payment created in favor of…”
Honeywell, Inc. v. Minnesota Life & Health Ins. Guar., 110 F.3d 547 (8th Cir. 1997). · cites it 18× “ELIC's insolvency had also affected approximately 10,000 other Minnesota residents who were employed in Minnesota by other companies whose plan trustees owned GICs but which trustees were not Minnesota residents.”
In Re the Trust Established Under Trust Agreement of Boright, 377 N.W.2d 9 (Minn. 1985). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 61B.06 (1984). Accordingly, and in keeping with our previously demonstrated reluctance to approve alterations to the plans thoughtfully laid down by the settlor in the expectation that the trust would be carried out according to its terms, we decline to depart from…”
Honeywell, Inc. v. Minnesota Life & Health Ins. Guar. Ass'n, 86 F.3d 766 (8th Cir. 1996). · cites it 3× “Minn.Stat. Ann. § 61B.06, subd. 2 (West 1986).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.