| Court: | moed |
| Docket #: | 4:13-cv-00020 |
| Case Name: | Vision Films, Inc. v. Does 1-30 |
| PACER case #: | 124525 |
| Date filed: | 2013-01-04 |
| Date of last filing: | 2013-04-01 |
| Case Cause: | 17:101 Copyright Infringement |
| Nature of Suit: | Copyright |
| Date Filed | Document # | Attachment # | Short Description | Long Description | Upload date | SHA1 hash |
| 2013-01-04 | 1 | 0 | Complaint | |||
| 2013-01-07 | 2 | 0 | Report re:Patent/Trademark/Copyright | |||
| 2013-01-10 | 3 | 0 | Motion for Leave to | |||
| 2013-01-11 | 4 | 0 | Disclosure of Corporation Interests Certificate | |||
| 2013-01-11 | 5 | 0 | Memorandum & Order | MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave [#3] is denied without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 1/11/2013. (RAK) | 2013-01-12 08:31:53 | ef0a45d76f314298950d44d87f810d9f039a22f0 |
| 2013-01-14 | 6 | 0 | Motion for Leave to | |||
| 2013-01-16 | 7 | 0 | Memorandum & Order | MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a Proposed Protective Order defining the scope and parameters of the expedited discovery sought by January 22, 2013. Plaintiff shall review the Protective Orders entered in Xpays, Inc. V. Does 1-18, Cause No. 4:12 CV1405 RWS (E.D. Mo. Aug. 20, 2012), West Coast Productions, Inc. v. Swarm Sharing Hash Files 25600BE3C6CC4529AC4247FA9B6BCB8B530857EB, et al., No. 4:12CV748 and Digital Sin, Inc. v. John Does 1-176, No. 12-CV-126, 2012 WL 263491, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2012), as examples of what the Court expects plaintiff to file. The motion will be denied if plaintiff does not comply with this Order.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 1/16/13. (LGK) | 2013-01-17 08:54:54 | 32a9267dd157ee24ec5d726d5407cad5285aeeaa |
| 2013-01-18 | 8 | 0 | Memorandum | |||
| 2013-01-22 | 9 | 0 | Protective Order | |||
| 2013-04-01 | 10 | 0 | Pro Se Motion | 2013-04-11 19:54:03 | e718fc3380f58939b7118352395e4fa1365e01bd | |
| 2013-06-12 | 13 | 0 | MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pro se objections filed by John Doe defendants [10 and 11] are denied as set out above.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 6/11/13. (LGK) | 2013-06-12 08:17:49 | 8106cf1b612f1fc1d272504e16c5b913d91bcec6 |