Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-951 (2026)

Filing of petition; designation of judges to hear election contests; trial by, and verdict of, jury; assumption of office

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Except as otherwise provided by Section 23-15-955 or 23-15-961, a person desiring to contest the election of another person returned as elected to any office within any county, may, within twenty (20) days after the election, file a petition in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the county, setting forth the grounds upon which the election is contested. When such a petition is filed, the circuit clerk shall immediately notify, by registered letter, telegraph, telephone, or personally the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court or in his or her absence, or disability, some other Justice of the Supreme Court, who shall forthwith designate and notify a circuit judge or chancellor of a district other than that which embraces the district, subdistrict, county or any of the counties, involved in the contest or complaint, to proceed to the county in which the contest or complaint has been filed to hear and determine the contest or complaint. The circuit clerk shall also cause a copy of such petition to be served upon the contestee, which shall serve as notice to such contestee.

The Supreme Court shall compile a list of judges throughout the state to hear such disputes before an election. The name of any judge selected to hear election day disputes shall be provided to the Secretary of State by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court at the time the appointment is made, unless the Secretary of State is a party to the election day dispute to which the special circuit judge is appointed. It shall be the official duty of the designated circuit judge or chancellor to proceed to discharge the duty of hearing the contest at the earliest possible date. The date of the contest shall be fixed by the judge or chancellor, and the judge or chancellor shall provide reasonable notice to the contestant and the contestee of the date and time fixed for the contest. The judge or chancellor shall cause the contestant and contestee to be served in a reasonable manner. When the contestee is served, such contestee shall promptly file his or her answer, and cross-complaint, if the contestee has a cross-complaint.

The court shall, at the first term, cause an issue to be made up and tried by a jury, and the verdict of the jury shall find the person having the greatest number of legal votes at the election. If the jury shall find against the person returned elected, the clerk shall issue a certificate thereof; and the person in whose favor the jury shall find shall be commissioned by the Governor, and shall qualify and enter upon the duties of his or her office. Each party shall be allowed ten (10) peremptory challenges, and new trials shall be granted and costs awarded as in other cases. In case the election of district attorney or other state district election be contested, the petition may be filed in any county of the district or in any county of an adjoining district within twenty (20) days after the election, and like proceedings shall be had thereon as in the case of county officers, and the person found to be entitled to the office shall qualify as required by law and enter upon the duties of his or her office.

A person desiring to contest the election of another person returned as elected to any seat in the Mississippi Legislature shall comply with the provisions of Section 23-15-955. A person desiring to contest the qualifications of a candidate for nomination in a political party primary election shall comply with the provisions of Section 23-15-961.

Derived from 1972 Code § 23-5-187 [Codes, Hutchinson's 1848, ch. 7, art 7 (1); 1857, ch. 4, art 23; 1871, § 391; 1880, § 150; 1892, § 3679; 1906, § 4186; Hemingway's 1917, § 6820; 1930, § 6258; 1942, § 3287; repealed by Laws, 1986, ch. 495, § 335]; Laws, 1986, ch. 495, § 291; Laws, 1988, ch. 577, § 5; Laws, 1999, ch. 301, § 13; Laws, 2000, ch. 450, § 1, eff. 8/7/2000 (the date the United States Attorney General interposed no objection under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965).

Amended by Laws, 2024, ch. 462, HB 1135,§ 2, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by Laws, 2013, ch. 432, HB 649, 1, eff. 10/22/2013 (the date that the U.S. Attorney General interposed no objection under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 17 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1991–2024 · leading case: McIntosh v. Sanders, 831 So. 2d 1111 (Miss. 2002).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

McIntosh v. Sanders, 831 So. 2d 1111 (Miss. 2002). · cites it 10× “Therefore, Sanders had to resort to the post-election remedy of Miss.Code Ann. § 23-15-951 (2001), the statute for contesting general elections which states: a person desiring to contest the election of another person returned as elected to any office within any county, may,…”

Chris McDaniel v. Thad Cochran, 158 So. 3d 992 (Miss. 2014). · cites it 2× “” Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-951 (Rev. 2007) (emphasis added).”

Wilbourn v. Hobson, 608 So. 2d 1187 (Miss. 1992). · cites it 2× “Peggy Hobson filed an election contest in the Hinds County Circuit Court pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-951 (1972). See In re Wilbourn, 590 So.”

Waters v. Gnemi, 907 So. 2d 307 (Miss. 2005). “Finally, we note that election contests (both primary and general) are by their very nature required to be put on a "fast-track" by both election officials and the courts.”

Rush v. Ivy, 853 So. 2d 1226 (Miss. 2003). · cites it 2× “Furthermore, Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-951 (Rev.2001) does not mandate that all issues in an election contest must be tried by a jury.”

Stringer v. Lucas, 608 So. 2d 1351 (Miss. 1992). “*1358 In his bench opinion, Special Judge Eugene Bogen found that the circuit court lacked the authority to order a new election because of the mandates of Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-951 (Supp. 1988) and May .”

Sumner v. City of Como Democratic Comm., 972 So. 2d 616 (Miss. 2008). “pursuant to and by authority of Miss.Code Ann. § 23-15-951 and § 9-1-105.”

Misso v. Oliver, 666 So. 2d 1366 (Miss. 1996). “Then Oliver could have filed his election contest under Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-951 (1991) with a trial held in circuit court on the issue of the qualifications of the voters and the propriety of the ruling by the managers.”

Town of Terry v. Smith, 48 So. 3d 507 (Miss. 2010). “Miss.Code Ann. § 23-15-961 (Rev.2007). . Miss.”

In Re Wilbourn, 590 So. 2d 1381 (Miss. 1991). “Another potential problem with the TRO is that the provisions for a candidate challenging the manner or results of the election require that such election contest be filed within 20 days after the election, pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-951 . The 20th day falls on November…”

Tunica Cnty. Democratic Exec. Comm. v. Craig Jones, 233 So. 3d 792 (Miss. 2017). “Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-927 (Rev. 2015). Section 23-15-951 provides the procedure to contest a general election.”

Ceola James v. Latrice Westbrooks, 275 So. 3d 62 (Miss. 2019). “Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-951 (Rev. 2018). ¶9.”

Show all 17 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.