Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-71 (2026)

Appeals to supreme court

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Appeals in accordance with law may be had to the Supreme Court of the State of Mississippi from any final judgment of the chancery court.

(a) If the party taking the appeal has theretofore furnished security as provided in Sections 77-3-39 and 77-3-69, and has filed a bond conditioned as provided in Sections 77-3-39 and 77-3-69, the taking of an appeal to the supreme court shall operate as a supersedeas without the furnishing of further security or bond. In such cases the supreme court may, upon application to it, require such additional security, or such additional bond conditioned as provided in Sections 77-3-39 and 77-3-69, as in its opinion will adequately secure the other party to the appeal, or parties who may become entitled to refunds, against loss in the event the judgment under review is affirmed.

(b) If an appeal to the supreme court be taken from a final judgment of the chancery court which alters an order of the commission by approving a level of revenue in excess of that allowed by the commission's order, the public utility may, as a matter of right, place such level of revenue which has been so approved by the chancery court in such final judgment into effect, pending final determination of the appeal to the supreme court, upon filing with the supreme court a bond in a reasonable amount approved by such court, with sureties approved by such court, conditioned upon the refund with interest at the lawful rate to the parties entitled thereto, of the amount of the excess if the rates so put into effect are finally determined to be excessive. In lieu of payment, the utility may credit the service account with the amount due under this section if the consumer entitled to the refund, is at that time, a consumer of the utility.

(c) In addition to the foregoing, if an appeal to the supreme court be taken from a final judgment of the chancery court with respect to a proceeding for determination of rates, and the public utility is not then collecting under refunding bond rates in excess of rates which have been ordered by the commission, such utility may request upon motion filed in the supreme court an order allowing the utility to place into effect forthwith interim rates which may be charged and collected, subject to refund as hereinafter provided, pending final determination of the rate proceeding. The court may, in its discretion, upon a hearing by not fewer than three (3) justices and upon a finding that undue hardship or irreparable injury to the utility or the public interest would probably result otherwise, allow the utility to place into effect such interim rates at a revenue level up to, but not exceeding, the proposed rates. The court may allow the utility to collect all or part of a proposed rate increase. However, before such increased rates can take effect, the utility shall file with the court a bond in a reasonable amount approved by the court, with sureties approved by the court, conditioned upon the refund, with interest at the lawful rate, to the parties entitled thereto, of the amount of the excess after the existing rate or rates or the rate or rates so put into effect are finally determined to be excessive. In lieu of payment, the utility may credit the service account with the amount due under this section if the consumer entitled to the refund is, at that time, a consumer of the utility.

If the court does not dispose of the motion for interim rates as contemplated herein within thirty (30) days of the filing of such motion, then the public utility, as a matter of right, may place into effect forthwith fifty percent (50%) of that portion of the proposed rate schedule not allowed by the commission's order, pending final determination of the appeal, upon filing with the court a surety bond in the same manner as previously provided for herein. If the court does not make a final determination and adjudication of the rate proceeding within one hundred eighty (180) days after the record has been certified and filed, or if the court remands the matter to the commission for further proceedings and the commission has not entered its order allowing rates within forty-five (45) days from the time of receipt of the mandate of the court, or if the commission has at any time entered its order after remand and an appeal therefrom has been taken, then, in any such case, the public utility may, as a matter of right, place into effect the entire proposed rate schedule, under refunding bond, as provided for in this section or in Section 77-3-39, whichever is applicable. Interim rates under refunding bond charged by the utility under this subsection shall terminate upon final disposition of the rate proceeding without timely appeal.

Codes, 1942, § 7716-28; Laws, 1956, ch. 372, § 28; Laws, 1983, ch. 467, § 27, eff. 4/6/1983.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1982–1984 · leading case: Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n v. Mississippi, 456 U.S. 742 (1982).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n v. Mississippi, 456 U.S. 742 (1982). · cites it 2× “" Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-71 (1973). It is hardly clear on the statute's face, then, that PURPA's standing and appeal provisions grant any rights beyond those presently accorded by Mississippi law, and appellees point to no specific provision of the Act expanding on the State's…”

Mississippi Power Co. v. Goudy, 459 So. 2d 257 (Miss. 1984). “Section 28 of the Act, Miss. Code Ann. § 77-3-71 . The above statutory procedure was scrupulously followed in each of the three rate cases.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.