Busse v. St. Louis Blues, Inc., 409 S.W.3d 428 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013). · Go Syfert
Search
Busse v. St. Louis Blues, Inc., 409 S.W.3d 428 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Williams v. State (moctapp, 2018-12-18)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" Williams v. State
Mo. Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Williams , 409 S.W.3d at 434 .
discussed Cited "see" State v. Brown
Mo. Ct. App. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Williams , 409 S.W.3d 428 , 430, 434-35 (Mo. App. E.D. 2013) and State v. Anderson , 386 S.W.3d 186 , 188 (Mo. App. E.D. 2012) (affirming judgments of convictions under similar circumstance).
Brett BUSSE
v.
ST. LOUIS BLUES, INC., and SCP Worldwide I., L.P., St. Louis Blues Hockey Club, and Kiel Center Partners, LP, Defendants/Respondents
No. ED 98877.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Jun 18, 2013.
409 S.W.3d 428
Russell F. Watters, Patrick A. Bousquet, Mollie G. Mohan, Brown & James, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellant., Lawrence L. Pratt, Portia C. Kayser, St. Louis, MO, for respondents.
Amburg, Crane, Hoff.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Brett Busse, appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants/respondents. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).