Fleurime v. State, 537 S.W.3d 405 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018). · Go Syfert
Search
Fleurime v. State, 537 S.W.3d 405 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State of Missouri v. Dustin A. Foster (moctapp, 2019-12-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State of Missouri v. Dustin A. Foster
Mo. Ct. App. · 2019 · confidence medium
The video was recorded from 1 We state “the facts and all reasonable inferences derived therefrom in a light most favorable to the verdict, and we reject all contrary evidence and inferences.” State v. Liker, 537 S.W.3d 405, 407 (Mo. App. S.D. 2018) (reviewing a defendant’s double jeopardy claim on appeal). 2 Foster was charged in this case with three additional counts related to this minor female: first-degree statutory rape (Count III), first-degree statutory sodomy (Count IV) and incest (Count V).
cited Cited "see" STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. BRANDON PATRICK TEEL
Mo. Ct. App. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Liker, 537 S.W.3d 405, 413 (Mo. App. S.D. 2018).
discussed Cited "see" STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. CORY JAMES SMITH
Mo. Ct. App. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
Id. at 277 ; see State v. Liker, 537 S.W.3d 405, 413 (Mo. App. 2018); State v. Woods, 357 S.W.3d 249, 256 (Mo. App. 2012); see also Rule 29.12(c) (permitting a trial court to correct such clerical errors in the judgment that obviously are a result of oversight or omission).
Siril FLEURIME
v.
STATE of Missouri
WD 80340.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Jan 16, 2018.
537 S.W.3d 405
Damien De Loyola, Kansas City, MO, for appellant., Julia E. Neidhardt, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Gabbert, Newton, Witt.
Published

ORDER

Per curiam:

Appellant Siril Fleurime (“Fleurime”) is appealing the denial of his Amended Rule 24.035 motion following an evidentiary hearing. Fleurime sought to vacate his guilty plea and sentence for a class A felony of domestic assault in the first degree, section 565.072, and armed criminal action, section 571.015. Fleurime’s 24.035 motion alleges that his statements at his plea hearing called into question whether he acted “knowingly” when he committed the offenses. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).