Ward v. State, 759 S.W.2d 607 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988). · Go Syfert
Search
Ward v. State, 759 S.W.2d 607 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for cluster 5246760.
Chester WARD
v.
STATE of Missouri
No. 53966.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Aug 30, 1988.
759 S.W.2d 607
Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant., William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robert V. Franson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals after the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion following an evidentiary hearing. The findings, conclusions, and judgment of the trial court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 27.26(j).

An extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).