State v. Harry, 814 S.W.2d 2 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Harry, 814 S.W.2d 2 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State Ex Rel. Lopp v. Munton (moctapp, 2002-01-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) State Ex Rel. Lopp v. Munton
Mo. Ct. App. · 2002 · confidence medium
Less v. O’Brien, 814 S.W.2d 2, 4 (Mo.App.
cited Cited as authority (rule) State ex rel. FAG Bearings Corp. v. Perigo
Mo. Ct. App. · 1999 · confidence medium
Less v. O’Brien, 814 S.W.2d 2, 3 (Mo.App.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State ex rel. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Missouri
Mo. Ct. App. · 1995 · confidence medium
Less v. O’Brien, 814 S.W.2d 2, 4 (Mo.App.1991); see also Note, The Writ of Prohibition in Missouri, Wash. U.L.Q. 511, 522 and 524 (1972) (prohibition often issued in discovery matters when appeal an inadequate remedy).
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent
v.
Clifton HARRY
No. 58476.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Jul 30, 1991.
814 S.W.2d 2
Raymond L. Legg, Columbia, for defendant/appellant., William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Millie Aulbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff/respondent.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this jury-tried case, defendant appeals his conviction for receiving stolen property in violation of § 570.080, RSMo 1986.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).