State v. Coleman, 895 S.W.2d 637 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Coleman, 895 S.W.2d 637 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Mayabb (moctapp, 2001-03-28)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Mayabb
Mo. Ct. App. · 2001 · confidence medium
E.D. 1999); State v. Evans, 895 S.W.2d 637, 638 (Mo.App.
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Smith
Mo. Ct. App. · 1999 · confidence medium
State v. Evans, 895 S.W.2d 637, 638 (Mo.App.
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Petty
Mo. Ct. App. · 1998 · confidence medium
State v. Evans, 895 S.W.2d 637, 638 (Mo.App.
STATE of Missouri
v.
Askia J. COLEMAN, Appellant Askia J. COLEMAN v. STATE of Missouri
Nos. 64149, 66495.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Mar 28, 1995.
895 S.W.2d 637
Rose M. Wibbenmeyer, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant., Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Crahan, Gaertner, Reinbard.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered pursuant to his conviction by a jury of unlawful possession of cocaine in violation of § 195.202 RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to two years imprisonment. In his sole point on appeal,[1] Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find Defendant’s contention to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

1

Defendant also filed a separate appeal from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after evidentiary hearing. However, Defendant makes no assignment of error with respect to that ruling and the appeal is therefore deemed abandoned.