State v. Hornsby, 910 S.W.2d 830 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Hornsby, 910 S.W.2d 830 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Adoption of C.M. v. E.M.B.R. (moctapp, 2013-10-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Adoption of C.M. v. E.M.B.R.
Mo. Ct. App. · 2013 · confidence medium
Neglect has also been described as the “failure to fulfill the duty imposed upon the parent by law and by conscience.” In re Adoption of Z.T.H., 910 S.W.2d 830, 835 (Mo.App.W.D.1995).
cited Cited as authority (rule) In Re JPB
Mo. Ct. App. · 2006 · confidence medium
In re Adoption of Z.T.H., 910 S.W.2d 830, 835 (Mo.App. *770 1995).
cited Cited as authority (rule) J.R.M. v. J.E.B.
Mo. Ct. App. · 2006 · confidence medium
In re Adoption of Z.T.H., 910 S.W.2d 830, 835 (Mo.App. 1995).
cited Cited as authority (rule) McElroy v. Eagle Star Group, Inc.
Mo. Ct. App. · 2005 · confidence medium
In re Adoption of Z.T.H., 910 S.W.2d 830, 835 (Mo.App.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Bell v. Bell
Mo. Ct. App. · 1999 · confidence medium
In re Adoption of Z.T.H., 910 S.W.2d 830, 836 (Mo.App.1995).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) STATE EX REL. IN INTEREST OF RP v. Rosen
Mo. Ct. App. · 1998 · confidence medium
In re Adoption of Z.T.H. v. M.H., 910 S.W.2d 830, 836 (Mo. App.1995); In re Aldridge, Ledoux v. Aldridge, 841 S.W.2d 793, 802 (Mo.App.1992); Piedimonte v. Nissen, 817 S.W.2d 260, 269 (Mo.App.1991); Counts v. Bracken, 494 So.2d 1275 (La.Ct.App.1986); Roberts v. District Court of Larimer County, 198 Colo. 79 , 596 P.2d 65 (1979).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State ex rel. R.P. v. Rosen
Mo. Ct. App. · 1998 · confidence medium
In re Adoption of Z.T.H. v. M.H., 910 S.W.2d 830, 836 (Mo.App.1995); In re Aldridge, Ledoux v. Aldridge, 841 S.W.2d 793, 802 (Mo.App.1992); Piedimonte v. Nissen, 817 S.W.2d 260, 269 (Mo.App.1991); Counts v. Bracken, 494 So.2d 1275 (La.Ct.App.1986); Roberts v. District Court of Larimer County, 198 Colo. 79 , 596 P.2d 65 (1979).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Williams v. Williams
Mo. Ct. App. · 1997 · confidence medium
In the case of In re Adoption of Z.T.H., 910 S.W.2d 830, 834 (Mo.App.1995), this court looked at the issue of whether the party who sought service employed “the most reasonable means” of informing a natural parent of an adoption proceeding.
STATE of Missouri
v.
Thomas W. HORNSBY, Appellant Thomas W. HORNSBY v. STATE of Missouri
Nos. WD 48899, WD 50576.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Nov 28, 1995.
910 S.W.2d 830
Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant., Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Breckenridge, Smart, Spinden.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Thomas W. Hornsby was convicted by a jury of the class A felony of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1994, and sentenced by the court as a prior offender, §§ 558.016 and 557.036.4, RSMo 1994, to twelve years in prison, to be served consecutively to previous sentences. Mr. Hornsby appeals his conviction and the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion, claiming that the trial court plainly erred in allowing the State to exercise a racially motivated peremptory strike and that the motion court erred in denying his post-conviction motion because his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to file a timely request for change of judge.

The judgment of conviction and the order denying the Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion are affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).