Mo. Rev. Stat. § 407.145
Rulemaking, authority, limitation
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
407.145. Rulemaking, authority, limitation. — The attorney general shall have the authority to promulgate, in accordance with the provisions of chapter 536, all rules necessary to the administration and enforcement of the provisions of this chapter. Such rules may include, but need not be limited to, provisions designating the size and style of type which shall be used in written disclosures required by any provision of this chapter for which the size and style of type have not been otherwise designated.
--------
(L. 1986 S.B. 685, A.L. 1993 S.B. 52)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2001–2025 · leading case: Ports Petroleum Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Nixon
Ports Petroleum Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Nixon (2001)
“The attorney general is given the authority, in section 407.145, to promulgate "all rules necessary to the administration and enforcement" of the merchandising practices act.”
Huch v. Charter Communications, Inc. (2009)
“Section 407.145; State ex rel Nixon v. Telco Directory Pub.”
In Re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust Litigation (2004)
“020(1) (authorized by Mo.Rev.Stat. § 407.145). 47 The regulation also states that “[pjroof of deception, fraud, or misrepresentation is not required to prove unfair practices as used in section 407.”
Chochorowski v. Home Depot U.S.A. (2013)
“[o]ffends any public policy as it has been established by the Constitution, statutes or common law of this state, or by the Federal Trade Commission, or its interpretive decisions; or 2.”
Jackson v. Hazelrigg Automotive Service Center, Inc. (2014)
“§ 407.145. In this case, Jackson relies on 15 CSR 60-8.”
State ex rel. Koster v. Charter Communications, Inc. (2015)
“” § 407.145. See also Brixen, 29 P.3d at 659 (under a virtually identical CID statutory scheme, attorney general of Utah treated as administrative agency).”
Tiffanie Soetaert v. Novani Flips, LLC, Platinum Realty of Missouri, LLC (2021)
“at 724-25 (citing section 407.145) (internal quotation marks omitted).”
Tommy Heinz v. Driven Auto Sales, LLC, d/b/a Driven Auto Sales, First Community Credit Union (2020)
“” First Community asserted that as a credit union subject to chartering, licensing, or regulation by the director of the division of credit 2 Pursuant to § 407.145, the legislature granted to the attorney general the authority to issue rules setting out the scope and meaning of…”
Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region & Southwest Missouri, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Andrew Bailey, Attorney G (2025)
“The MMPA prohibits in relevant part “[t]he act, use or employment by any person of any deception, fraud, false pretense, false promise, misrepresentation, unfair practice or the concealment, suppression, or omission of any material fact in connection with the sale or…”
SANDY JACKSON v. HAZELRIGG AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CENTER, INC., Defendant-Respondent. (2014)
“§ 407.145. In this case, Jackson relies on 15 CSR 60-8.”
State of Missouri ex rel. Attorney General Chris Koster v. Charter Communications, Inc., D/B/A Charter Communications, C (2015)
“” § 407.145. See also Brixen, 29 P.3d at 659 (under a virtually identical CID statutory scheme, attorney general of Utah treated as administrative agency).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.