State v. Chauvin, 210 Mont. 1 (Mont. 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Chauvin, 210 Mont. 1 (Mont. 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
36 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Vaska v. State (alaska, 2006-05-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Vaska v. State (2×)
Alaska · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Daniels, 210 Mont. 1 , 682 P.2d 173 (1984); Felix v. State, 109 Nev. 151 , 849 P.2d 220 (1993), superseded on other grounds by rule as stated in Evans v. State, 117 Nev. 609 , 28 P.3d 498 (200I); State v. Rohrich, 132 Wash.2d 472 , 939 P.2d 697 (1997).
discussed Cited "see" State Ex Rel. Kuntz v. Montana Thirteenth Judicial District Court (2×)
Mont. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Daniels (1984), 210 Mont. 1 , 16, 682 P.2d 173, 181 . 1 Ultimately, whether or not her use of force was justified will be determined by the jury.
cited Cited "see" State v. Sattler
Mont. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Daniels (1984), 210 Mont. 1, 16 , 682 P.2d 173, 181 .
discussed Cited "see" State v. Sattler (2×)
Mont. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Daniels (1984), 210 Mont. 1, 16 , 682 P.2d 173, 181 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Miranda
Colo. Ct. App. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
In that circumstance, later "admitting the child's hearsay puts the defendant in a constitutionally impermissible Catch-22 of calling the child for direct or waiving his confrontation *528 rights." State v. Rohrich, 132 Wash.2d 472 , 939 P.2d 697 , 701 (1997) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also State v. Daniels, 210 Mont. 1 , 682 P.2d 173 , 178-79 (1984) (Because declarant excused without any questioning regarding out-of-court statements, declarant was "not subject to cross-examination concerning the statement" and the statement was therefore inadmissible.), superseded by statute on o…
STATE OF MONTANA
v.
RICHARD R. CHAUVIN
No. DC-83-85A.
Montana Supreme Court.
Jan 6, 1984.
210 Mont. 1
Gary, Henson, Review, Sullivan.
Published

DECISION

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of 3 years imposed on September 26, 1983, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that: the sentence shall be amended to 3 years with 2 years suspended, and the Defendant is to make restitution of $1,000 within 6 months, and the balance within one year of release. The Defendant shall be under the Supervision of the Department of Adult Probation and Parole for the suspended portion of this sentence.

Reason for the amendment are:

[*2] DATED this 6th day of January, 1984.

(1) This is the Defendant’s first offense; and

(2) By reducing the sentence, it will enable the Defendant to make restitution sooner.

We wish to thank Stephen Pohl, Attorney from Bozeman, for his assistance to this court.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION Joseph B. Gary, Chairman; Mark Sullivan, John Henson.