2-4-703. Receipt of additional evidence. If, before the date set for hearing, application is made to the court for leave to present additional evidence and it is shown to the satisfaction of the court that the additional evidence is material and that there were good reasons for failure to present it in the proceeding before the agency, the court may order that the additional evidence be taken before the agency upon conditions determined by the court. The agency may modify its findings and decision by reason of the additional evidence and shall file that evidence and any modifications, new findings, or decisions with the reviewing court.
Mont. Code Ann. § 2-4-703
Receipt Of Additional Evidence
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MT-LEGleg.mt.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
TITLE 2. GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE AND ADMINISTRATION
CHAPTER 4. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT
Part 7. Judicial Review of Contested Cases
Receipt Of Additional Evidence
History: En. Sec. 16, Ch. 2, Ex. L. 1971; amd. Sec. 17, Ch. 285, L. 1977; R.C.M. 1947, 82-4216(5).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1982–2022 · leading case: Pannoni v. Board of Trustees, Browning School District No. 9
Pannoni v. Board of Trustees, Browning School District No. 9 (2004)
“" Section 2-4-703, MCA (emphasis added). The agency may then modify its findings and decision based on the additional evidence and file the modifications or new findings with the reviewing court.”
O'NEILL v. Department of Revenue (1987)
“Our analysis of these issues begins with the Montana Administrative Procedure Act (MAPA) Section 2-4-703, MCA, which requires prior permission of the court before any additional evidence can be presented to an administrative agency: “If, before the date set for hearing,…”
BNSF Railway Co. v. O'Dea (2009)
“[8] Mont.Code Ann. § 2-4-703. [9] Int'l Coll.”
Schneeman v. State, Dept. of Labor & Ind. (1993)
“She relies on § 2-4-703, MCA, a provision of the Montana Administrative Procedure Act (MAPA), which allows for the presentation of additional evidence during judicial review of a contested case if the evidence is material and there is a good reason for failure to present it in…”
Wage Claim of Holbeck v. Stevi-West, Inc. (1989)
“) Section 2-4-703, MCA. The evidence sought to be introduced by Stevi-West consisted of testimony of three individuals employed by the bowling center concerning the number of employees supervised by Holbeck.”
Whitehall Wind, LLC v. Montana Public Service Commission (2010)
“The PSC further argued that § 2-4-703, MCA, precluded augmentation of the record because Whitehall had not made the necessary showing.”
Arlington v. MILLER'S TRUCKING, INC. (2012)
“The court acknowledged that it could order the consideration of additional evidence, pursuant to §2-4-703, MCA, which provides: If, before the date set for hearing, application is made to the court for leave to present additional evidence and it is shown to the satisfaction of…”
SHAMROCK MOTORS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant (1997)
“Mont. Code Ann. § 2-4-703 . Rather, the court is required to return the case to the agency so that it can hear that evidence and then “modify its findings and decision” if it deems that appropriate.”
Pryor School District Nos. 2 & 3 v. Superintendent of Public Instruction (1985)
“Section 2-4-703, MCA. *79 The appellant, school district, did apply for leave to submit additional evidence pursuant to Section 2-4-703, MCA.”
Hi-Line Radio Fellowship v. Department of Revenue (1987)
“” Section 2-4-703, MCA, relating to judicial review of contested cases under the “Montana Administrative Procedure Act,” provides: “If, before the date set for hearing, application is made to the court for leave to present additional evidence .”
Department of Labor & Industry v. Al's Sales, Inc. (1990)
“Section 2-4-703, MCA. In the case now before us, it is clear that the lower court was not adequately informed of the circumstances surrounding the default.”
BNSF Railway Company v. Rod (2022)
“…modifications, new findings, or decisions with the reviewing court. Mont. Code Ann. § 2-4-703 . BNSF argues, and the Court agrees, that its motion to present additional evidence is timely because there has not been a hearing yet on the petition for judicial review. To…”
— Mont. Code Ann. § 2-4-703(3) — 1 case
Ibsen v. MSBME (2021)
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.