Mont. Code Ann. » TITLE 90. PLANNING, RESEARCH, AND DEVELOPMENT · CHAPTER 4. ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AND CONSERVATION · Part 4. Pacific Northwest Electric Power and Conservation Planning Council

Mont. Code Ann. § 90-4-401

Agreement To Pacific Northwest Electric Power And Conservation Planning Council

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. MCA Contents
  2. TITLE 90
  3. CHAPTER 4
  4. Part 4
  5. 90-4-401 Agreement to pacific northwest electric power and conservation planning council

TITLE 90. PLANNING, RESEARCH, AND DEVELOPMENT

CHAPTER 4. ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AND CONSERVATION

Part 4. Pacific Northwest Electric Power and Conservation Planning Council

Agreement To Pacific Northwest Electric Power And Conservation Planning Council

90-4-401. Agreement to pacific northwest electric power and conservation planning council. The state of Montana agrees through this part and through the appointment of persons as provided in this part to formation of and participation in the pacific northwest electric power and conservation planning council, hereafter referred to in this part as "the council", and to the performance of the functions and duties of the council as provided in the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act (Public Law 96-501).

History: En. Sec. 1, Ch. 50, L. 1981.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1986–2007 · leading case: Seattle Master Builders Ass'n v. Pacific Northwest Electric Power & Conservation Planning Council
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Seattle Master Builders Ass'n v. Pacific Northwest Electric Power & Conservation Planning Council (1986) ca9 · cites it 3× “800; (1985); MontCode Ann. § 90-4-401 (1985); Idaho Code § 61-1201 (1985).”
Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. Bonneville Power Administration (2007) ca9 “Each state has agreed to participate in the Council, see Idaho Code § 61-1201 ; Mont.Code Ann. § 90-4-401; Or.Rev.Stat. § 469.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.