For purposes of sections 16-117 and 16-130:
(1) Lands, lots, tracts, streets, or highways shall be deemed contiguous although a stream, embankment, strip, or parcel of land not more than two hundred feet wide lies between the same and the corporate limits; and
(2) In counties in which at least three cities of the first class are located, lands, lots, tracts, streets, or highways shall be deemed contiguous although property owned by the federal government lies between the same and the corporate limits, so long as the lands, lots, tracts, streets, or highways sought to be annexed are adjacent to or contiguous with the property owned by the federal government. The annexation of any lands, lots, tracts, streets, or highways described in this subdivision shall not result in any change in the service area of any electric utility without the express agreement of the electric utility serving the area comprising such annexed lands, lots, tracts, streets, or highways at the time of annexation, except that at such time following the annexation of the lands, lots, tracts, streets, or highways as the city lawfully annexes sufficient intervening area so as to directly connect the lands, lots, tracts, streets, or highways to the primary area of the city, such lands, lots, tracts, streets, or highways shall, solely for the purposes of section 70-1008, be treated as if they had been annexed by the city on the date upon which the intervening area had been formally annexed.
Notes of Decisions
Johnson v. City of Hastings, 488 N.W.2d 20 (Neb. 1992).
· cites it 4× “§ 16-118 (Reissue 1991), which states: “Lands, lots, tracts, streets, or highways shall be deemed contiguous although a stream, embankment, strip, or parcel of land not more than two hundred feet wide lies between the same and the corporate limits.”
Cnty. of Sarpy v. City of Papillion, 765 N.W.2d 456 (Neb. 2009).
· cites it 2× “" [10] Contiguity or adjacency is also not specifically defined by statute, but Neb. Rev. Stat. § 16-118 (Reissue 2007) states that "[l]ands, lots, tracts, streets, or highways shall be deemed contiguous although a stream, embankment, strip, or parcel of land not more than two…”
Doolittle v. Cnty. of Lincoln, 214 N.W.2d 248 (Neb. 1974).
· cites it 8× “The plaintiffs assert that the statute, section 16-118, R. R. S. 1943, is plain and unambiguous, and prohibits separation of the annexed tract from the existing boundaries by more than 200 feet.”
Adam v. City of Hastings, 668 N.W.2d 272 (Neb. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 3× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 16-118 (Reissue 1997) states: “Lands, lots, tracts, streets, or highways shall be deemed contiguous although a stream, embankment, strip, or parcel of land not more than two hundred feet wide lies between the same and the corporate limits.”
Piester v. City of North Platte, 251 N.W.2d 159 (Neb. 1977).
· cites it 2× “Section 16-118, R. R. S. 1943, prohibits the annexation of noncontiguous land.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.