Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 24

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-319

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

24-319.

Transferred to section 25-21,201.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases, 1945–1994 · leading case: Rumbel v. Ress
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rumbel v. Ress (1958) neb · cites it 12× “Section 24-319, R. R. S. 1943, provides in part: “The several district courts of the judicial districts of the state shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine * * * (4) all cases where the State of Nebraska shall have a lien or any other interest, apparent or real, upon or…”
Wiseman v. Keller (1984) neb · cites it 4× “, Neb.Rev. Stat. §§ 24-319 (Reissue 1979), 25-1012.”
Beatrice Manor, Inc. v. Department of Health (1985) neb · cites it 2× “What we did say was that because the director of the Department of Motor Vehicles as a person is charged with a statutory duty of protecting the public interest, and was served with summons, that did not make the review proceeding an action against the State of Nebraska within…”
Lj Vontz Const. v. State, Dept. of Roads (1988) neb · cites it 3× “On the basis of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-319 (1) (Reissue 1985), concerning appellate jurisdiction of the district courts over claims presented to the Director of Administrative Services, Vontz appealed to the district court and filed petitions in conformity with Neb.”
Patteson v. Johnson (1985) neb · cites it 3× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-319 (Reissue 1979). Neb.”
Gentry v. State (1962) neb · cites it 2× “1943, which, so far as material herein, reads as follows: “The several district courts of the judicial districts of the state shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine (1) all claims against the state filed therein which have previously been presented to the Auditor of…”
Sinn v. City of Seward (1994) nebctapp · cites it 2× “, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 24-319 (Reissue 1979), 25-1012.”
Frye v. Sibbitt (1945) neb · cites it 2× “The appellants contend that the court was without jurisdiction to reform the deed to the state of Nebraska and that notwithstanding the attempted reformation the state of Nebraska became and still is the owner of the directly affected lands. They contend that authority has never…”
Offutt Housing Company v. County of Sarpy (1955) neb · cites it 2× “It has been held that: “Generally, an action for a declaratory judgment cannot be maintained against the state without its consent, the state’s immunity from suit being held unaffected by declaratory judgment *323 statutes; but such an action may be maintained under statutes…”
VisionQuest, Inc. v. State (1986) neb · cites it 5× “VisionQuest alleges that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-319 (Reissue 1979) specifically controls the procedure in this case.”
Vision Quest, Inc. v. State (1986) neb · cites it 6× “VisionQuest alleges that Neb.Rev.Stat. § 24-319 (Reissue 1979) specifically controls *27 the procedure in this case.”
Leach v. State Department of Motor Vehicles (1982) neb · cites it 3× “However, that section is applicable only to actions brought under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-319 (Reissue 1979), which include claims rejected or disallowed by the Director of Administrative Services, claims for relief that may be presented to the Legislature, setoffs and claims for…”
Show all 14 citing cases →
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-319(5) — 1 case
Patteson v. Johnson (1985) neb “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-319 (Reissue 1979). Neb.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.