Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 29

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2028

Sexual assault; testimony; corroboration not required

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The testimony of a person who is a victim of a sexual assault as defined in sections 28-319 to 28-320.01 shall not require corroboration.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26 cases (10 in the last 5 years), 1990–2025 · leading case: State v. Mrza
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Mrza (2019) neb · cites it 2× “49 (c) Analysis Mrza argues that although Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2028 (Reissue 2016) states, "The testimony of a person who is a victim of a sexual assault .”
State v. Anders (2022) neb · cites it 3× “Anders acknowledges that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2028 (Reissue 2016) “did away with the [victim] corroboration requirement in sexual assault cases.”
State v. Davis (2009) neb · cites it 2× “Davis apparently overlooks the 1989 enactment of Neb.Rev.Stat. § 29-2028 (Reissue 1995). Since 1989, the State has not been required to corroborate a victim's testimony in cases of first degree sexual assault.”
State v. Schmidt (2008) nebctapp · cites it 6× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2028 (Reissue 1995) provides, "The testimony of a person who is a victim of a sexual assault as defined in sections 28-319 to 28-320.”
State v. Kelly (2013) nebctapp · cites it 2× “Kelly’s argument conflicts with the 1989 enactment of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2028 (Reissue 2008).”
State v. Red Kettle (1991) neb · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2028 (Reissue 1989) provides: “The testimony of a person who is a victim of a sexual assault as defined in sections 28-319 to 28-320.”
State v. Schmidt (2008) neb · cites it 2× “[5] (b) Disposition It is undisputed that the challenged jury instruction is a correct statement of the law as set forth in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2028 (Cum. Supp. 2006).”
State v. Tlamka (1993) nebctapp · cites it 6× “The Nebraska Legislature has enacted Neb.Rev.Stat. § 29-2028 (Reissue 1989), which provides: "The testimony of a person who is a victim of a sexual assault as defined in sections 28-319 to 28-320.”
State v. Luff (2010) nebctapp · cites it 2× “Luff argues essentially that Neb.Rev.Stat. § 29-2028 (Reissue 2008), which provides that the "testimony of a person who is a victim of a sexual assault as defined in sections 28-319 to 28-320.”
State v. Williamson (1990) neb · cites it 3× “The appellant’s counsel argues that since corroboration is no longer required in sexual offense cases, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2028 (Reissue 1989), reports of the crime to others are inadmissible.”
State v. Madren (2020) nebctapp “Madren acknowledges that, pursuant to § 29-2028, the State was not required to corroborate [L.”
State v. Harden (2016) nebctapp · cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2028 (Reissue 2008).”
Show all 26 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.