Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2323
Appeal of sentence by prosecutor; sentencing alternatives
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Upon consideration of the criteria enumerated in section 29-2322, the appellate court shall:
(1) If it determines that the sentence imposed is excessively lenient, set aside the sentence, and:
(a) Remand the case for imposition of a greater sentence;
(b) Remand the case for further sentencing proceedings; or
(c) Impose a greater sentence; or
(2) If it determines that the sentence imposed is not excessively lenient, affirm the sentence.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21
cases, 1986–2018 · leading case: State v. Kennedy
State v. Kennedy (2018)
“32 Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2323 (1) (Reissue 2016), if an appellate court determines a sentence is excessively lenient, it may set aside the sentence and either (a) remand the case for imposition of a greater sentence, (b) remand the case for further sentencing…”
State v. Fields (2004)
“Under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2323 (Reissue 1995), when an appellate court determines that a sentence imposed is excessively lenient, it shall either (1) remand the cause for imposition of a greater sentence, (2) remand the cause for further sentencing proceedings, or (3) impose a…”
State v. Hense (2008)
“§ 29-2323 (Reissue 1995), the Legislature has specifically granted the court authority to set aside an excessively lenient sentence and either impose a greater sentence or remand the cause. The State chose not to proceed under the excessively lenient statutes in this felony…”
State v. Vasquez (2006)
“Under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2323 (Reissue 1995), this court may set aside an excessively lenient sentence and either impose a greater sentence or remand the cause.”
State v. Rice (2005)
“In this circumstance, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2323 (Reissue 1995) permits an appellate court to set aside the sentence and either (1) remand the cause for imposition of a greater sentence, (2) remand the cause for further sentencing proceedings, or (3) impose a greater sentence.”
State v. Moore (2008)
“In this *796 circumstance, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2323 (Reissue 1995) permits aii appellate court to set aside the sentence and either (1) remand the cause for imposition of a greater sentence, (2) remand the cause for further sentencing proceedings, or (3) impose a greater…”
State v. Hamik (2001)
“Accordingly, pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2323 (1)(a) (Reissue 1995), we vacate the sentence of probation and remand the cause to the district court with directions to impose a greater sentence.”
State v. Stafford (2009)
“[15] See Neb.Rev.Stat. § 29-2323 (Reissue 2008). [1] State v.”
State v. Vela (2017)
“We further stated in our opinion in his direct appeal that Vela was not on trial for the murder of Lundell and instead that “Vela’s involvement in the Lundell murder was simply the evidence by which the State sought to prove aggravating circumstance § 29-2323(1)(a), a…”
State v. Wojcik (1991)
“Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2320 (Reissue 1989), the State has appealed, claims that the sentence of probation is too lenient, and requests this court to set aside Wojcik’s sentence and impose an appropriate sentence under the circumstances.”
State v. Winsley (1986)
“§ 29-2323 (1) (Reissue 1985) provides: If [the Supreme Court] determines that the sentence imposed is excessively lenient, [it may] set aside the sentence, and: (a) Remand the case for imposition of a greater sentence; (b) Remand the case for further sentencing proceedings; or…”
State v. Dobbins (1986)
“The appeal is properly filed under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2321 (Cum. Supp. 1984), and this court has the following options under Neb.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2323(1) — 1 case
State v. Fields (2004)
“Under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2323 (Reissue 1995), when an appellate court determines that a sentence imposed is excessively lenient, it shall either (1) remand the cause for imposition of a greater sentence, (2) remand the cause for further sentencing proceedings, or (3) impose a…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2323(1)(a) — 2 cases
State v. Vela (2017)
“We further stated in our opinion in his direct appeal that Vela was not on trial for the murder of Lundell and instead that “Vela’s involvement in the Lundell murder was simply the evidence by which the State sought to prove aggravating circumstance § 29-2323(1)(a), a…”
State v. Hatt (2008)
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2323(l)(a) — 1 case
State v. Harrison (1998)
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.