Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2465 (2026)

Personal representative to proceed without court order; exception

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A personal representative shall proceed expeditiously with the settlement and distribution of a decedent's estate and, except as otherwise specified or ordered in regard to a supervised personal representative, do so without adjudication, order, or direction of the court, but he may invoke the jurisdiction of the court, in proceedings authorized by this code, to resolve questions concerning the estate or its administration.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1987–2021 · leading case: In re Est. of Beltran, 310 Neb. 174 (Neb. 2021).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In re Est. of Beltran, 310 Neb. 174 (Neb. 2021). · cites it 3× “The probate court reasoned that Mario could not invoke the jurisdiction of the court under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2465 (Reissue 2016), because he was not the personal representative, and that under § 30-402, the personal representative was not the person Mario had sought to have…”

In Re Est. of Walker, 402 N.W.2d 251 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 4× “Neb.Rev.Stat. § 30-2465 (Reissue 1985) provides: A personal representative shall proceed expeditiously with the settlement and distribution of a decedent's estate and, except as otherwise specified or ordered in regard to a supervised personal representative, do so without…”

Marten v. Staab, 543 N.W.2d 436 (Neb. 1996). · cites it 2× “Furthermore, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2465 (Reissue 1989) provides that a personal representative “may invoke the jurisdiction of the [county] court, in proceedings authorized by this [probate] code, to resolve questions concerning the estate or its administration.”

In Re Est. of Snover, 443 N.W.2d 894 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 2× “Section 30-2464 provides that the personal *203 representative has a duty to settle and distribute the estate as expeditiously and efficiently as is consistent with the best interests of the estate and must use his authority for the best interests of successors to the estate.”

In Re Est. of Rosso, 701 N.W.2d 355 (Neb. 2005). “” § 30-2465. That authority was used in this case to allow the county court to hold a hearing and determine the ownership of the Strata stock.”

Kenner v. Blue Valley Lutheran Homes Soc'y, Inc., 513 N.W.2d 35 (Neb. Ct. App. 1994). “§ 30-2465. In article 24, part 11, “Compromise of Controversies,” §§ 30-24,123 and 30-24,124, the code allows competent parties having beneficial interests in an estate pursuant to a will clouded by a good faith contest or controversy to reach a settlement agreement, which will…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.