Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 31-755 (2026)

Improvements; bonds; warrants; procedure; issuance; negotiability; extension of due date; hearing; interest; levy; sinking fund; tax

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

For the purpose of paying the cost of the improvements herein provided for, the board of trustees or the administrator, after such improvements have been completed and accepted, shall have the power to issue negotiable bonds of any such district, to be called sanitary and improvement district bonds, payable in not to exceed thirty years. Each issue of general obligation bonds shall mature or be subject to mandatory redemption so that the first principal repayment is made not more than five years after the date of issuance and so that at least twenty percent of the district's bonds then outstanding shall be repaid within ten years after the date of issuance. Such bonds shall bear interest payable annually or semiannually. Such bonds may either be sold by the district or delivered to the contractor in payment for the work but in either case for not less than their par value. For the purpose of making partial payments as the work progresses, warrants may be issued by the board of trustees or the administrator upon certificates of the engineer in charge showing the amount of work completed and materials necessarily purchased and delivered for the orderly and proper continuation of the project, in a sum not to exceed ninety-five percent of the cost thereof. Warrants issued prior to July 10, 1976, for capital outlays of the district shall become due and payable twelve months after April 21, 1982, and warrants issued on or after July 10, 1976, for capital outlays of the district shall become due and payable not later than five years from the date of issuance, except that such warrants need not be retired on such date or within such five-year period and shall not be in default if the district court of the county determines, upon application to it by the district, that the district does not have the funds to retire such warrants and either (1) the district is unable to sell its bonds in amount sufficient to retire such warrants or (2) an unreasonably high tax levy, as compared to the levy on other similar property in the county, would be required in order to cover the debt service requirements on bonds issued to retire such warrants. Such application may be filed either before or within ninety days after the due date of the warrants, and no warrant for which an extension application has been made to the district court and a hearing date set by the court shall be in default while such application is pending before the court. Notice of the filing of such application and the time and place of the hearing thereon shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the county the same day each week three consecutive weeks. Within five days after the first publication of such notice, the district shall cause to be mailed, by United States certified mail, a copy of such notice to each holder of warrants covered by the application whose name and post office address are known to the district. Prior to the hearing, proof of such mailing shall be made by affidavit of a trustee of the district or the administrator or the district's attorney that such mailing was made and further that the district, its trustees or administrator, and its attorney, after diligent investigation and inquiry, were unable to ascertain and do not know the name and post office address of any holder of such warrants other than those to whom notice has been mailed in writing or who have waived notice in writing or entered an appearance in the proceeding. Upon making such determination, the district court may make such orders concerning retirement of the warrants as it determines proper under the circumstances of the district including ordering an increase in the tax levy of the district to provide funds for warrant redemption, except that no court-ordered tax levy for redemption of warrants shall cause the total tax levy of the district to be unreasonably high as compared with the tax levy of other similar property in the county. Such warrants shall draw interest, at such rate as fixed by the board of trustees or the administrator and endorsed on the warrants, from the date of presentation for payment and shall be redeemed and paid from the proceeds of special assessments or from the sale of the bonds issued and sold as provided in this section or from any other funds available for that purpose. Bonds to redeem such warrants shall be issued as soon as economically feasible, and to the extent warrants are not redeemed from bond proceeds or other funds available for such purpose, the district shall make a tax levy to provide a sinking fund for warrant redemption, except that such obligation shall not require a total tax levy by the district which shall be unreasonably high as compared with the tax levy on other similar property in the county. The board of trustees or the administrator shall after August 26, 1983, pay to the contractor interest at the rate specified in section 39-1349, as such rate may from time to time be adjusted by the Legislature, on the amounts due on partial and final payments, beginning thirty days after the certification of the amounts due by the engineer in charge and approval by the board of trustees or the administrator and running until the date that the warrant is tendered to the contractor. Warrants issued for operation and maintenance expenses of the district shall be issued not later than sixty days following the date upon which the district is in receipt of a bill for the amount of operation or maintenance expenses owed and such warrants shall become due and payable not later than three years from the date of issuance. If a warrant for operation or maintenance expenses is not issued within such sixty-day period, the amount owed by the district shall bear interest from the sixty-first day until the date upon which the warrant is issued at a rate equivalent to one and one-half times the rate specified in subsection (2) of section 45-104.02. The district shall agree to pay annual or semiannual interest on all capital outlay warrants issued by the district and shall issue warrants to pay such interest or shall issue its warrants in return for cash to pay such interest. Interest on capital outlay warrants shall be represented by coupons payable to bearer attached to each warrant, but coupons shall not be issued for interest accruing after the due date of such warrant. All coupons shall show on their face the number of the warrant to which they appertain and that the coupon shall not be valid for payment of any interest after the warrant has been called for redemption or redeemed. Warrant interest coupons not paid when due for lack of funds shall be registered, bear interest, and be paid the same as is provided in section 10-209 for bond coupons. Warrants issued to pay interest on capital outlay warrants shall become due and payable in the same time as capital outlay warrants. The district may, if determined appropriate by the board of trustees or the administrator, pay fees to fiscal agents in connection with the placement and registration of ownership of warrants issued by the district. The board of trustees or the administrator shall levy special assessments on all lots, parcels, or pieces of real estate benefited by the improvement to the extent of the benefits to such property. The special assessments when collected shall be set aside and constitute a sinking fund for the payment of the interest and principal of such bonds. In addition to the special assessments provided for in this section, there shall be levied annually a tax upon the taxable value of all the taxable property in such district which, together with such sinking fund derived from special assessments, shall be sufficient to meet payments of interest and principal on all bonds as such become due. Such tax levy shall be known as the sanitary and improvement district bond tax levy and shall be payable annually in money.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1967–2024 · leading case: SID No. 596 v. THG Dev., 315 Neb. 926 (Neb. 2024).
SID No. 596 v. THG Dev., 315 Neb. 926 (Neb. 2024). · cites it 4× “The cost of such improvements shall be paid from the assessments levied against all the property in the district, in the man- ner provided by section 31-755, or may be paid from unappropriated money in its general fund.”
Hayes v. Sanitary & Improvement Dist. No. 194, 244 N.W.2d 505 (Neb. 1976). · cites it 7× “Section 31-755, R. R. S. 1943, dealing with the issuance and sale of such bonds provides in part: “Such bonds may either be sold by the district or delivered to the contractor in payment for the work, but in either case for not less than their- par value.”
Hollstein v. First Nat. Bank of Aurora, 437 N.W.2d 512 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 4× “) § 31-755. The board of trustees or the administrator shall have the power to negotiate a scaling, discounting, reduction in *717 interest rate, or any other compromise of any or all of the bonds, warrants, or other indebtedness of the district with the owners or holders of…”
Sanitary & Improvement Dist. No. 65 v. Wefso, 365 N.W.2d 456 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 5× “65 of Sarpy County, Nebraska, applied, pursuant to the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 31-755 et seq. (Reissue 1984), for an extension of time within which to retire certain warrants it had issued and which, but for favorable action on the application, would become due and…”
Sanitary & Improvement Dist. 65 v. First Nat'l Bank of Aurora, 73 B.R. 205 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1986). · cites it 8× “der Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code, or under the Nebraska Statutes, are the claims of bondholders of a Sanitary and Improvement District (SID) superior to the claims of warrantholders of an SID thereby requiring or permitting the debtor to treat the claims of bondholders with…”
Sanitary & Improvement Dist. 65 of Sarpy Cnty. v. First Nat'l Bank of Aurora, 79 B.R. 877 (D. Neb. 1987). · cites it 5× “Neb.Rev.Stat. § 31-755 (1984), provides: For the purpose of paying the costs of the improvements herein provided for, the Board of Trustees or the Administrator, after such improvements have been completed and accepted, shall have the power to issue negotiable bonds of any such…”
Sanitary & Improvement Dist. No. 32 v. Cont'l W. Corp., 343 N.W.2d 314 (Neb. 1983). · cites it 5× “In 1978 the following language was added to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 31-755 (Reissue 1978): “Interest on capital outlay warrants shall be represented by coupons payable to bearer attached to each warrant, but coupons shall not be issued for interest accruing after the due date of such…”
Matter of Sanitary & Imp. Dist., No. 7, 98 B.R. 970 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1989). · cites it 2× “Section 31-755? 4. May the debtor impair its contract with bondholders contrary to Article 1, Section 10 of the United States Constitution? 5.”
Metro. Life Ins. v. Sanitary & Improvement Dist. No. 222, 281 N.W.2d 922 (Neb. 1979). · cites it 2× “The validity of the bonds is not contested. Metropolitan concedes that the bonds shall remain an obligation of the District, and the question is, then, whether they shall be repaid by special assessment or by general levy as provided in section 31-755, R.”
Sanitary & Improvement Dist. No. 75 v. City of Ralston, 152 N.W.2d 111 (Neb. 1967). · cites it 2× “We also direct that the court proceed with a hearing on the petition for approval of all proceedings and for the approval of issuance and sale of bonds, and that district 75 be permitted to issue bonds for not to exceed 30 years, in accordance with section 31-755, R. R. S. 1943,…”
SID No. 1 v. Adamy, 289 Neb. 913 (Neb. 2015). “40 CONCLUSION A sanitary and improvement district can levy municipal taxes and make municipal improvements. As such, we con- clude that SID #1 has stated a cause of action under § 31-114.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.