Sections 38-101 to 38-1,148 and the following practice acts shall be known and may be cited as the Uniform Credentialing Act:
(1) The Advanced Practice Registered Nurse Practice Act;
(2) The Alcohol and Drug Counseling Practice Act;
(3) The Athletic Training Practice Act;
(4) The Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology Practice Act;
(5) The Behavior Analyst Practice Act;
(6) The Certified Nurse Midwifery Practice Act;
(7) The Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist Practice Act;
(8) The Chiropractic Practice Act;
(9) The Clinical Nurse Specialist Practice Act;
(10) The Cosmetology, Electrology, Esthetics, Nail Technology, and Body Art Practice Act;
(11) The Dentistry Practice Act;
(12) The Dialysis Patient Care Technician Registration Act;
(13) The Emergency Medical Services Practice Act;
(14) The Environmental Health Specialists Practice Act;
(15) The Funeral Directing and Embalming Practice Act;
(16) The Genetic Counseling Practice Act;
(17) The Hearing Instrument Specialists Practice Act;
(18) The Licensed Practical Nurse-Certified Practice Act until November 1, 2017;
(19) The Massage Therapy Practice Act;
(20) The Medical Nutrition Therapy Practice Act;
(21) The Medical Radiography Practice Act;
(22) The Medicine and Surgery Practice Act;
(23) The Mental Health Practice Act;
(24) The Nurse Practice Act;
(25) The Nurse Practitioner Practice Act;
(26) The Nursing Home Administrator Practice Act;
(27) The Occupational Therapy Practice Act;
(28) The Optometry Practice Act;
(29) The Perfusion Practice Act;
(30) The Pharmacy Practice Act;
(31) The Physical Therapy Practice Act;
(32) The Podiatry Practice Act;
(33) The Psychology Practice Act;
(34) The Respiratory Care Practice Act;
(35) The Surgical First Assistant Practice Act; and
(36) The Veterinary Medicine and Surgery Practice Act.
If there is any conflict between any provision of sections 38-101 to 38-1,148 and any provision of a practice act, the provision of the practice act shall prevail except as otherwise specifically provided in section 38-129.02.
Notes of Decisions
In Re Guardianship of Sain, 319 N.W.2d 100 (Neb. 1982).
· cites it 14× “That section authorizes the appointment of a guardian in accordance with either Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 38-101 to 38-120 (Reissue 1978) or § 43-111.”
State v. Jones, 317 Neb. 559 (Neb. 2024).
· cites it 3× “2 In Garrotto, we concluded that under article V of the Nebraska Constitution, the district court was a court of general jurisdiction of this state, which was divided into judicial districts for the transaction of judicial business, but that so far as the creation of a court was…”
Meyers v. Meyers, 383 N.W.2d 784 (Neb. 1986).
· cites it 4× “) Neb.Rev.Stat. § 38-101 (Reissue 1984) states that "[a]ll persons under nineteen years of age are declared to be minors," unless they marry before age 19.”
In Re Interest of Steven K., 661 N.W.2d 320 (Neb. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 4× “See Neb.Rev.Stat. § 38-101 (Reissue 1984). Traditionally, chapter 38 dealt with the guardianship of minors.”
Yagodinski v. Sutton, 309 Neb. 179 (Neb. 2021).
· cites it 3× “18 See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 38-101 to 38-1,145 (Reissue 2016 & Cum.”
Lawson v. Ford Motor Co., 408 N.W.2d 256 (Neb. 1987).
· cites it 4× “Section 25-213 concerns itself only with age; it makes no reference to marital status.”
State v. Foster, 242 N.W.2d 876 (Neb. 1976).
· cites it 3× “In support of his position, appellant points out that under section 38-101, R. R. S. 1943, all persons under 19 years of age are declared to be minors.”
State of Iowa Ex Rel. Petersen v. Miner, 412 N.W.2d 832 (Neb. 1987).
· cites it 2× “Appellant also asserts, in his assignments of error, that the district court erred in finding that the legal age of majority would be governed by Nebraska law, age 19 ( Neb. Rev. Stat. § 38-101 (Reissue 1984)), rather than Iowa law, age 18 ( Iowa Code Ann.”
Kloch v. Kohl, 545 F.3d 603 (8th Cir. 2008).
“(2007) (recodified with amendments as the Uniform Credentialing Act, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 38-101 et seq. (2008)). The Uniform Licensing Law distinguished between investigation, prosecution, and adjudication of disciplinary actions against a physician’s license; and the law provided…”
Rose Ex Rel. Rose v. Nebraska, 530 F. Supp. 295 (D. Neb. 1981).
· cites it 2× “Her failure to remain in school is in direct contravention of Judge Denney’s Order requiring that Marla remain in her “current educational placement” throughout these proceedings.”
Planned Parenthood of Heartland v. Heineman, 724 F. Supp. 2d 1025 (D. Neb. 2010).
· cites it 2× “LAWS GOVERNING NURSES AND NURSE PRACTITIONERS Nebraska’s Uniform Credentialing Act is found at Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 38-101 to 38-1,140. It prohibits individuals from engaging in nursing or advanced practice nursing, unless they hold the proper credential from DHHS.”
Planned Parenthood of the Heartland v. Hilgers, 317 Neb. 217 (Neb. 2024).
· cites it 2× “In doing so, we determined that “[t]here [was] no such close relation between the manufacture of sugar and the manufacture of chicory as to say that provisions for the encouragement of the manufac- ture of the one are the means by which the encouragement of the other is…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 38-101(7) — 1 case
Yagodinski v. Sutton, 309 Neb. 179 (Neb. 2021).
“18 See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 38-101 to 38-1,145 (Reissue 2016 & Cum.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.