Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 39
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-662 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

39-662.

Transferred to section 60-6,186.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases, 1975–1993 · leading case: State v. Huffman, 275 N.W.2d 838 (Neb. 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Huffman, 275 N.W.2d 838 (Neb. 1979). · cites it 6× “No one has ever suggested that section 39-662, R.R.S. 1943, or other similar enactments are unconstitutionally vague and I predict that this court will never say so.”
State v. Padley, 237 N.W.2d 883 (Neb. 1976). · cites it 7× “At the time of her arrest sections 39-662 and 39-662.01, R. S. Supp.”
Hyde v. Cleveland, 279 N.W.2d 105 (Neb. 1979). · cites it 4× “The court further found plaintiff was negligent in that his vehicle was not equipped with adequate brakes; he was traveling at a rate of speed in excess of that permitted by section 39-662, R. S. Supp., 1976, because of the.”
State v. Roth, 382 N.W.2d 348 (Neb. 1986). · cites it 4× “Also, the evidence establishes that Roth violated Neb.Rev. Stat. § 39-662 (Reissue 1984), which provides that no person shall drive through a residential district at a speed in excess of 25 m.”
State v. Lomack, 476 N.W.2d 237 (Neb. 1991). · cites it 2× “, was convicted of driving an automobile at 32 miles per hour in a 25-mile-per-hour zone, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-662 (2)(a) (Reissue 1988) (25 miles per hour in a residential district), and was sentenced to pay a fine of $15 and costs.”
Koncaba v. Scotts Bluff Cnty., 464 N.W.2d 764 (Neb. 1991). · cites it 4× “The foregoing evidence, which has been summarized, establishes that the plaintiff's decedent was guilty of contributory negligence which as a matter of law was more than slight when compared with the negligence of the defendants.”
State v. Prahin, 455 N.W.2d 554 (Neb. 1990). · cites it 2× “Prahin, was convicted of speeding, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-662 (2)(f) (Reissue 1988), and of possessing a controlled substance (cocaine) with the intent to deliver same, in violation of Neb.”
State v. Kincaid, 453 N.W.2d 738 (Neb. 1990). · cites it 5× “The complaint filed against defendant in the county court alleged a violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-662 (2) (Reissue 1988), in that defendant was driving 75 m.”
Mantz v. Cont'l W. Ins., 422 N.W.2d 797 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 3× “§ 39-662 (Reissue 1984) provides: No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions and having regard to the actual and potential *454 hazards then existing. Any person shall drive at a safe and appropriate speed…”
State v. Chambers, 486 N.W.2d 481 (Neb. 1992). · cites it 2× “Chambers, challenges the district court’s affirmance of the county court’s judgment that he violated Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-662 (Reissue 1988) by operating a motor vehicle in excess of the posted speed limit of 65 miles per hour.”
State Ex Rel. Douglas v. Gradwohl, 235 N.W.2d 854 (Neb. 1975). · cites it 12× “02 relating to costs creates an immunity from court costs for a particular class of persons convicted of traffic violations.”
Jacobson v. Higgins, 500 N.W.2d 558 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 2× “See, also, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-662 (2)(f) (Reissue 1988).”
Show all 17 citing cases →
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-662(1) — 1 case
State v. Huffman, 275 N.W.2d 838 (Neb. 1979). “No one has ever suggested that section 39-662, R.R.S. 1943, or other similar enactments are unconstitutionally vague and I predict that this court will never say so.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-662(2) — 2 cases
State v. Kincaid, 453 N.W.2d 738 (Neb. 1990). “The complaint filed against defendant in the county court alleged a violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-662 (2) (Reissue 1988), in that defendant was driving 75 m.”
State Ex Rel. Douglas v. Gradwohl, 235 N.W.2d 854 (Neb. 1975). “02 relating to costs creates an immunity from court costs for a particular class of persons convicted of traffic violations.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-662(2)(c) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Douglas v. Gradwohl, 235 N.W.2d 854 (Neb. 1975). “02 relating to costs creates an immunity from court costs for a particular class of persons convicted of traffic violations.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-662(2)(d) — 1 case
State v. Kincaid, 453 N.W.2d 738 (Neb. 1990). “The complaint filed against defendant in the county court alleged a violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-662 (2) (Reissue 1988), in that defendant was driving 75 m.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.