Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 7
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 7-104 (2026)

Admission to bar; oath; form

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Every attorney upon being admitted to practice in the Supreme Court or district courts of this state, shall take and subscribe an oath substantially in the following form: You do solemnly swear that you will support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of this state, and that you will faithfully discharge the duties of an attorney and counselor, according to the best of your ability.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 223 cases (23 in the last 5 years), 1934–2026 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Couns. for Discipline of the Neb. Supreme Court v. Wolfe, 301 Neb. 117 (Neb. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Ex Rel. Couns. for Discipline of the Neb. Supreme Court v. Wolfe, 301 Neb. 117 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 5× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 7-104 (Reissue 2012). With respect to the discipline to be imposed, the referee recommended suspension of respondent's license to practice law for a period of 2 years, commencing from the date of temporary suspension, November 6, 2017, followed by a period…”
State ex rel. Couns. for Discipline of the Neb. Supreme Court v. Nimmer, 916 N.W.2d 732 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 5× “It is the judgment of this court that Nimmer is disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Nebraska, effective immediately.”
State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Douglas, 416 N.W.2d 515 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 14× “All of the counts also allege a violation of the respondent’s oath as an attorney, as set out in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 7-104 (Reissue 1983). COUNTI In its “formal charge” against respondent, the Committee on Inquiry of the Second Disciplinary District alleged: *9 COUNTI 1.”
State Ex Rel. Couns. for Discipline of the Neb. Supreme Court v. Troshynski, 300 Neb. 763 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 4× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 7-104 (Reissue 2012). With respect to the discipline to be imposed, the referee recommended suspension of respondent's license to practice law for a period of 45 days, with a period of supervision of 2 years upon readmission.”
State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Frank, 631 N.W.2d 485 (Neb. 2001). · cites it 4× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 7-104 (Reissue 1997). On September 14, 2000, Frank filed an answer to the amended formal charges, admitting certain of the allegations, but denying that he had violated either the disciplinary rules or his oath as an attorney.”
State Ex Rel. Couns. for Dis. v. Koenig, 769 N.W.2d 378 (Neb. 2009). · cites it 6× “Following a hearing, the referee concluded that Koenig had violated the Nebraska Rules of Professional Conduct and Neb.Rev.Stat. § 7-104 (Reissue 2007). The referee recommended suspension from the practice of law for 1 year.”
State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Thor, 467 N.W.2d 666 (Neb. 1991). · cites it 5× “The referee appointed by this court, Rogers, held a formal hearing on the amended formal charges on February 26, 1990, and filed his report with this court on July 20,1990. The referee found that the respondent had violated DR 1-102(A)(4).”
State Ex Rel. Couns. for Discipline v. Thompson, 652 N.W.2d 593 (Neb. 2002). · cites it 2× “In a stipulation filed with the referee, Thompson admitted the allegations in the amended formal charges; admitted he violated his oath of office, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 7-104 (Reissue 1997); and admitted he violated various provisions of the Code of Professional Responsibility.”
State Ex Rel. Couns. for Discipline of the Neb. Supreme Court v. Trembly, 300 Neb. 195 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 3× “PROCEDURAL HISTORY On May 3, 2017, Counsel for Discipline of the Nebraska Supreme Court filed formal charges against Trembly, alleging that he violated his oath of office as an attorney, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 7-104 (Reissue 2012), and Neb.”
State Ex Rel. Couns. for Discipline v. Rokahr, 675 N.W.2d 117 (Neb. 2004). · cites it 2× “In connection with these findings, the referee concluded that Rokahr had violated Canon 1, DR 1-102; Canon 7, DR 7-102 and DR 7-104; and Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 7-104 and 7-106 (Reissue 1997).”
State ex rel. Couns. for Dis. v. Tighe, 886 N.W.2d 530 (Neb. 2016). · cites it 3× “7 The Counsel for Discipline argues that Tighe’s acts and omissions in relation to his representation of Miller constitute violations of his oath of office as an attorney licensed to prac- tice law in the State of Nebraska as provided by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 7-104 (Reissue 2012)…”
State Ex Rel. Couns. for Discipline v. Jones, 704 N.W.2d 216 (Neb. 2005). · cites it 2× “As to count I, relator alleges that respondent violated his oath of office as an attorney, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 7-104 (Reissue 1997), and the following provisions of the Code of Professional *475 Responsibility: Canon 1, DR 1-102(A)(1) (violation of disciplinary rule), DR…”
Show all 223 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.